Between papers and peril
Pakistani asylum narratives in Italy’s new migration moment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/fayg4883Keywords:
: Illegal Migration, Pakistani Migrants, Asylum Seekers, Migration Experiences, Italy, Qualitative Research,Abstract
This article examines how Pakistani men seeking protection in Italy make sense of leaving home, enduring irregular journeys, and rebuilding their lives under “paperwork time.” Drawing on ten in-depth, note-based interviews conducted across different stages of the asylum process, we apply reflexive thematic analysis to explore how migration decisions, danger, and belonging are narrated under high-stakes credibility pressures. The participants’ accounts rarely fit a simple refugee/economic binary: they describe layered motives shaped by family obligation, status aspirations, economic pressure, and, for some, chronic insecurity. Journeys are recalled as organized deprivation structured by debt and coercion, including hunger, unsafe water, injury, and threats by intermediaries. Arrival does not end hardship; it often transforms it into prolonged waiting, language dependence, precarious work, and loneliness. A central finding is that asylum operates as a narrative regime.
References
Abbas, P., von Werthern, M., Katona, C., Brady, F., & Woo, Y. (2021). The texture of narrative dilemmas: Qualitative study in front-line professionals working with asylum seekers in the UK. BJPsych Bulletin, 45(1), 8–14.
Ager, A., & Strang, A. (2008). Understanding integration: A conceptual framework. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21, 166–191.
Aliverti, A. J., & Tawfic, S. (2025). Caring states? Bureaucratic care, moral ideals and emotional dilemmas in British asylum and policing. Theoretical Criminology.
Ambrosini, M. (2025). The populist far right paradox: The identification of the enemy and its exceptions in the immigration policies of the Meloni government in Italy. Comparative Migration Studies, 13(1), 17.
Anderson, J., Hollaus, J., Lindsay, A., & Williamson, C. (2014). The culture of disbelief: An ethnographic approach to understanding an undertheorized concept in the UK asylum system (RSC Working Paper No. 102). Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.
Apatzidou, V. (2025). Bordering asylum: Examining the EU’s border procedures under the Asylum Procedures Regulation (EU) 2024/1348. International Journal of Refugee Law.
Asylum Information Database. (2025a). Country report: Italy – Update on 2024. European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
Asylum Information Database. (2025b, September 4). Italy: Statistics. European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
Bachelet, S. (2025). The adventure: Violent borders, illegal migration, and the uncertain quest for life in Morocco. Manchester University Press.
Balkin, J. M. (1986). Deconstructive practice and legal theory. Yale Law Journal, 96, 743–786.
Bhimji, F. (2018). The nexus of political violence and economic deprivation: Pakistani migrants disrupt the refugee/migrant dichotomy. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16(4), 470–487.
Boitcova, V. (2025). Queer enough: Methodological perspectives on the dramaturgy of queer refugee narratives and identity performance. SQS – Suomen Queer-tutkimuksen Seuran lehti, 19(1–2), 95–114.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Carling, J. R. (2002). Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 5–42.
Chaudhry, A., & Amis, J. M. (2025). Desperate journeys to Europe: Sensebreaking in extreme contexts. Journal of Management Studies, 62(3), 1153–1190.
Conte, C., & Yavcan, B. (2024). Reflection paper on the new EU pact on migration and asylum. Migration Policy Group.
Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2017). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48–64.
De Haas, H. (2021). A theory of migration: The aspirations–capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 8.
Dotsey, S. (2020). Migrants' reception and settlements in Italian cities: Exploring migrants' precarity, temporalities and integration during the “refugee crisis” (Doctoral dissertation).
Dotsey, S., & Lumley-Sapanski, A. (2021). Temporality, refugees, and housing: The effects of temporary assistance on refugee housing outcomes in Italy. Cities, 111, 103100.
EASO (European Asylum Support Office). (2018). Evidence and credibility assessment in the context of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS): Judicial analysis. Publications Office of the European Union.
ECRE (European Council on Refugees and Exiles). (2017). Accelerated, prioritized and fast-track asylum procedures in Europe: A comparative overview. Asylum Information Database.
European Commission, Eurostat. (2025, March 14). Asylum applications – annual statistics. Statistics Explained.
European Council on Refugees and Exiles. (2024). AIDA country report: Italy – 2024 update. Asylum Information Database.
EUAA (European Union Agency for Asylum). (2024). Practical guide on evidence and risk assessment. EUAA.
Feyissa, I. F., & Sherpa, S. (2025). Staying, leaving, or seeking more: International students’ postgraduation settlement and migration decisions in South Korea. Journal of International Students, 15(6), 129–150.
Gill, N., Hoellerer, N., Hambly, J., & Fisher, D. (2025). Inside asylum appeals: Access, participation and procedure in Europe. Taylor & Francis.
Griffiths, M. (2014). Out of time: The temporal uncertainties of refused asylum seekers and immigration detainees. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(12), 1991–2009.
Gundacker, L., Kosyakova, Y., & Schneider, G. (2025). How regional attitudes toward immigration shape the chance to obtain asylum: Evidence from Germany. Migration Studies, 13(1), mnae002.
Herlihy, J., & Turner, S. (2015). Untested assumptions: Psychological research and credibility assessment in legal decision-making. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6(1), 27380.
Herlihy, J., Scragg, P., & Turner, S. (2002). Discrepancies in autobiographical memories: Implications for the assessment of asylum seekers. BMJ, 324, 324–327.
Hussain, Z., Mumtaz, S., & Shah, T. H. (2025). Drivers and dynamics of illegal migration from Pakistan to Europe post-2020. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2).
Jones, J. A., & Donmoyer, R. (2021). Improving the trustworthiness of interview data in qualitative nonprofit sector research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(4), 889–904.
Kaufmann, D., & Bernhard, L. (2023). The use of the abuse policy narrative in asylum debates. Journal of Public Policy, 43(2), 307–325.
Kirişcioğlu, E., & Ustübici, A. (2025). Migration aspirations and risk perceptions among Syrian and Afghan communities. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 23(2), 292–306.
Koikkalainen, S., Kyle, D., & Nykänen, T. (2020). Imagination, hope and the migrant journey. International Migration, 58(4), 54–68.
Malloch, M. S., & Stanley, E. (2005). The detention of asylum seekers in the UK. Punishment & Society, 7(1), 53–71.
Massey, D. S. (1990). Social structure and cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 3–26.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration. Population and Development Review, 431–466.
Pact on Migration and Asylum. (2025, November 12). Migration and Home Affairs. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/pact-migration-and-asylum_en
Panebianco, S. (2019). The Mediterranean migration crisis: humanitarian practices and migration governance in Italy. Contemporary Italian Politics, 11(4), 386-400.
Panichella, N., Avola, M., & Piccitto, G. (2021). Migration, class attainment and social mobility: An analysis of migrants’ socio-economic integration in Italy. European Sociological Review, 37(6), 883-898.
Paskey, S. (2016). Telling refugee stories. Santa Clara Law Review, 56(3), 457–519.
Pons, P. O., Crang, M., & Travlou, P. (2016). Corrupted seas. In Cultures of mass tourism (pp. 157–174). Routledge.
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis. Duke University Press.
Ryo, E., Chacón, J. M., & Menjívar, C. (2025). Criminalization of immigration. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 11(3), 282–343.
Shah, P. (2020). The challenge of asylum to legal systems. Taylor & Francis.
Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. American Economic Review, 75(2), 173–178.
Taylor, J. E. (1999). The role of remittances in migration. International Migration, 37(1), 63–88.
Triculescu, R. M., Goetz, K. H., & Röth, L. (2025). Synchronizing out of gridlock. Journal of European Integration, 1–26.
UNHCR. (2013). Beyond proof: Credibility assessment in EU asylum systems.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2025). Integration between challenges and opportunities: Socioeconomic conditions of refugees in Italy.
Yang, D., Nikoloski, Z., Khalid, G., & Mossialos, E. (2024). Pakistan’s path to universal health coverage. International Journal for Equity in Health, 23(1), 162.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zubair Hussain, Ihtisham Ullah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0












