Examining the Role of Theory in Qualitative Research
A Literature Review of Studies on Chinese International Students in Higher Education
Scholars argue that higher education and international student research suffer from a lack of theoretical engagement, which is epistemologically limiting. This is troubling as theory frames research design and findings and pluralizes our understanding of a phenomenon. Given the large number of Chinese international students worldwide (and related research), this article uses them as an analytic example to understand the role of theories in shaping qualitative research designs, focuses, and findings. I reviewed 43 qualitative research articles on Chinese international students’ experiences. Twenty-eight percent of the articles were found to lack theoretical engagement. When used, theories clustered around acculturation and sociocultural perspectives. Sixty percent of the articles foregrounded student challenges, as opposed to student agency or changes (40%). I discuss the consequences of a lack of theoretical engagement or diversity on how we understand and support international students.
Abdullah, D., Abd Aziz, M. I., & Mohd Ibrahim, A. L. (2014). A “research” into international student-related research: (Re)visualising our stand? Higher Education, 67(3), 235–253. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9647-3
Abelmann, N., & Kang, J. (2014). A fraught exchange? U.S. media on Chinese international undergraduates and the American university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 382–397.
Alford, R. R. (1998). The craft of inquiry: Theories, methods, evidence. Oxford University Press.
Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305.
Andreotti, V., Ahenakew, C., & Cooper, G. (2011). Epistemological pluralism: Ethical and pedagogical challenges in higher education. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 7(1), 40–50.
Bedenlier, S., Kondakci, Y., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Two decades of research into the internationalization of higher education: Major themes in the journal of studies in international education (1997–2016). Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(2), 108–135.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34.
Bodycott, P., & Lai, A. (2012). The influence and implications of Chinese culture in the decision to undertake cross-border higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(3), 252–270.
Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Cultures of learning: Language classrooms in China. In E. H. Coleman (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169–206). Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–32). SAGE.
Durkin, K. (2008). The middle way: East Asian master’s students’ perceptions of critical argumentation in UK universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(1), 38–55.
García, E. E. (2001). Understanding and meeting the challenge of student cultural diversity. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Garvin, D. (1987). Competing on the eight dimensions of quality. Harvard Business Review, 1987, 101–109.
Gingrich, A. (2006). Nation, status and gender in trouble? Exploring some contexts and characteristics of neo-nationalism in Western Europe. Neo-nationalism in Europe and beyond: Perspectives from social anthropology (pp. 29–49). Berghahn.
Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning graduate school: Explaining first‐year doctoral attrition. New Directions for Higher Education, 101, 55–64.
Guo, Y., & Guo, S. (2017). Internationalization of Canadian higher education: discrepancies between policies and international student experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 42(5), 851–868.
Halliburton, D. (1997). John Dewey: A voice that still speaks to us. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(1), 24–29.
Haugh, M. (2016). Complaints and troubles talk about the English language skills of international students in Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), 727–740.
Heggins, W. J., III, & Jackson, J. F. L. (2003). Understanding the collegiate experience for Asian international students at a midwestern research university. College Student Journal, 37(3), 379–391.
Heng, T. T. (2018). Chinese international students' advice to incoming Chinese first year students: Involving students in conversations with them, not about them. Journal of College Student Development, 59(2), 231–237.
Heng, T. T. (2019). Understanding the heterogeneity of international students’ experiences: A case study of Chinese international students in U.S. universities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(5), 607–623.
Henze, J., & Zhu, J. (2012). Current research on Chinese students studying abroad. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7(1), 90–104. doi:10.2304/rcie.2012.7.1.90
Institute for International Education. (2018). Open Doors 2018 Fact Sheets. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://www.iie.org/en/Research-and-Insights/Open-Doors/Fact-Sheets-and-Infographics/Infographics
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1993). Cultural orientation and academic language use. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Byram (Eds.), Language and culture (pp. 84–97). Multilingual Matters.
Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. SAGE.
Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31.
Kostogriz, A., & Peeler, E. (2007). Professional identity and pedagogical space: Negotiating difference in teacher workplaces. Teaching Education, 18(2), 107–122.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post‐structural perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87–99.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation: Cambridge University Press.
Leask, B. (2005). Internationalisation of the curriculum. In K. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving learning for all (pp. 119–129). Routledge.
Lee, J., Jon, J.-E., & Byun, K. (2017). Neo-racism and neo-nationalism within East Asia: The experiences of international students in South Korea. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(2), 136–155. doi:10.1177/1028315316669903
Marginson, S., Nyland, C., Sawir, E., & Forbes-Mewett, H. (2010). International student security. Cambridge University Press.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, R. (2004). Education and society: Issues and explanations in the sociology of education. Polity.
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.
Ramia, G., Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2013). Regulating international students’ wellbeing. Policy Press.
Rocco, T. S., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2009). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Resource Development Review, 8(1), 120–130.
Ryan, J. (2011). Teaching and learning for international students: Towards a transcultural approach. Teachers and Teaching, 17(6), 631–648.
Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6–13.
Stein, S. (2017). The persistent challenges of addressing epistemic dominance in higher education: Considering the case of curriculum internationalization. Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S25–S50.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). SAGE.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of group relations (pp. 61–76). Academic Press.
Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a‐theoretical community of practice? Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 395–411.
Tight, M. (2018). Higher education journals: Their characteristics and contribution. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 607–619.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2019). International student mobility in tertiary education. Retrieved January 10, 2019 from http://data.uis.unesco.org/#
Universities UK International. (2019). International facts and figures 2019. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/International/Documents/2019/International%20facts%20and%20figures%20slides.pdf
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 19–105). Harvard University Press.
Ward, C. A., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock. Routledge.
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (1996). The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences. Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Zhang-Wu, Q. (2018). Chinese international students’ experiences in American higher education institutes: A critical review of the literature. Journal of International Students, 8(2), 1173–1197.
Zhao, T., & Bourne, J. (2011). Intercultural adaptation—It is a two-way process: Examples from a British MBA programme. In J. L & C. M (Eds.), Researching Chinese learners: Skills, perceptions, and intercultural adaptations (pp. 250–273). Palgrave MacMillan.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of International Students
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.