Embracing a rational approach toward “the ranking rush”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/8mgkv121Keywords:
university ranking, rational approach, education quality, global competitionAbstract
This research briefly examines the growing influence of major global university rankings, such as QS, THE, ARWU, and U.S. News & World Report, on institutional strategies. Using document analysis and a narrative review, this study investigates the "ranking-mania" driven by perceived links between league tables and institutional reputation. Comparative mapping of ranking methodologies shows that reputation and research indicators currently dominate the landscape, whereas indicators of student outcomes remain minimal. These findings suggest that current metrics often fail to reflect the diverse needs of domestic and international students. Consequently, the study recommends that institutions move beyond the "ranking rush" to adopt a rational, mission-centric strategy that prioritizes substantive institutional improvements over the pursuit of fluctuating external metrics.
References
Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2011). College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: Establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts. Research in Higher Education, 52(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9185-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9185-0
Chirikov, I. (2023). Does conflict of interest distort global university rankings?. Higher Education, 86(4), 791-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00942-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00942-5
Davis, M. (2016). Can college rankings be believed?. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(3), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.11.002
James-MacEachern, M., & Yun, D. (2017). Exploring factors influencing international students’ decision to choose a higher education institution: A comparison between Chinese and other students. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(3), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2015-0158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2015-0158
Kim, J. (2018). The functions and dysfunctions of college rankings: An analysis of institutional expenditure. Research in Higher Education, 59(1), 54-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9455-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9455-1
Luca, M., & Smith, J. (2013). Salience in quality disclosure: Evidence from the US News college rankings. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(1), 58-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12003
Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 99–157). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_3?pdf=chapter%20toc DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_3
QS Quacquarelli Symonds. (2025). QS World University Rankings: Methodology. Retrieved December 22, 2025, from https://www.topuniversities.com/world-university-rankings/methodology
ShanghaiRanking Consultancy.(n.d.). Shanghai Ranking's Academic Ranking of World Universities Methodology 2025. Retrieved December 22, 2025, from https://www.shanghairanking.com/methodology/arwu/2025
Shahjahan, R. A., & Baizhanov, S. (2023). Global university rankings and geopolitics of knowledge. International Encyclopedia of Education, 2, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.08042-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.08042-8
Shin, J. C., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (2011). The past, present, and future of university rankings. In J. C. Shin, R. K. Toutkoushian, & U. Teichler (Eds.), University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education (pp. 1–16). Springer Netherlands. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Stella, A., & Woodhouse, D. (2006). Australian Universities Quality Agency: Ranking of Higher Education Institutions. Australian Universities Quality Agency. Retrieved from: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/127066/20110530-1318/www.auqa.edu.au/files/publications/ranking_of_higher_education_institutions_final.pdf
Times Higher Education. (2025, November 14). World University Rankings 2026: Methodology. Retrieved December 22, 2025, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/methodology
University of Houston. (n.d.). Mission, vision, & values. Retrieved December 22, 2025, from https://www.uh.edu/about/mission/
U.S. News & World Report (2025, June 16). How U.S. News Calculated the 2025-2026 Best Global Universities Rankings. Retrieved December 22, 2025, from https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of International Students
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) [year] [author]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
