Comparative analysis of digital learning tools’ impact on STEM education outcomes in Asian and European classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/jdgvhq96Keywords:
Digital Learning Tools, STEM Education, Student Engagement, Technology Integration, Teacher TrainingAbstract
The study used a mixed method, combining quantitative data from student test scores and participation surveys with qualitative insights from interviews with educators and students, to explore the impact of digital learning tools on STEM education outcomes in Asian and European classrooms, focusing on their effectiveness in enhancing student engagement and academic performance. The findings reveal that the integration of digital tools significantly improves both engagement and learning outcomes. Specifically, students demonstrated a over 4.3% increase in test scores across various STEM subjects, and engagement levels rose by over 26%. However, the study also finds that the effective implementation of digital learning tools faces the challenges of regional differences in access to digital infrastructure and the lack of continuous teacher training and technical support.
References
Akmad, A. (2024). Academic resilience in the face of internet challenges: A narrative analysis of tertiary students’ experiences. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(8), 551–563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0255
Akmad, A. P., & Abatayo, A. V. (2024). Caught in the slow lane: Effects of unstable internet connectivity on accessing academic resources and collaborative learning. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(9), 278–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0370
Anderson, J. L., & Barnett, M. (2013). Learning physics with digital game simulations in middle school science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 914–926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9438-8
Aydin, M., & Smith, D. R. (2023). Digital natives or digital immigrants? A comparative study of international STEM students’ technology use and academic success in the United States and Germany. Journal of International Students, 13(4), 45–63.
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26, 87–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Canals, L., & Al-Rawashdeh, A. (2019). Teacher training and teachers’ attitudes toward educational technology in the deployment of online English language courses in Jordan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 639–664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1531033
Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence–powered adaptive learning systems on STEM achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 215, Article 105089.
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 173–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046
Christopoulos, A., Conrad, M., & Shukla, M. (2018). Increasing student engagement through virtual interactions: How? Virtual Reality, 22(4), 353–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0330-3
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., … & Wissing, G. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and Covid-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4
Dinc, E. (2019). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of barriers to technology integration in education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 381–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634187
Eden, C. A., Chisom, O. N., & Adeniyi, I. S. (2024). Harnessing technology integration in education: Strategies for enhancing learning outcomes and equity. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 11(2), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.2.0071
Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., Wada, M., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Exploring privilege in the digital divide: Implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist, 59(1), e1–e15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny037
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10(4), Article 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications.
Fowler, F. J., Jr. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage Publications.
Freeman, B., Marginson, S., & Tytler, R. (2019). An international view of STEM education. In A. Sahin & M. J. Mohr-Schroeder (Eds.), STEM education 2.0 (pp. 350–363). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004405400_019
Graf, L., Powell, J. J., Fortwengel, J., & Bernhard, N. (2014). Made only in Germany? Internationalization and transfer of dual study programs. In S. B. Heikkinen & G. A. L. (Eds.), History of vocational education and training (VET): Cases, concepts and challenges. Brill.
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), Article n1.
Haesen, S., & Van De Put, E. (2018). STEAM education in Europe: A comparative analysis report. EuroSTEAM Project.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hrynevych, L., Morze, N., Vember, V., & Boiko, M. (2021). Use of digital tools as a component of STEM education ecosystem. Educational Technology Quarterly, 1, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.24
Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, Article 104031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031
Ismail, M. A. A., & Mohammad, J. A. M. (2017). Kahoot: A promising tool for formative assessment in medical education. Education in Medicine Journal, 9(2), 19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2017.9.2.2
Jahani, S., & Soto, R. (2024). Social and systemic influences on international students’ choice of a STEM major. Journal of International Students, 14(3), 61–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v14i3.6093
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
Lee, J. Y., & Park, S. H. (2024). The role of online collaborative platforms in fostering academic and social integration among East Asian STEM international students. Journal of International Students, 14(2), 112–129.
Li, M. (2024). Exploring the digital divide in primary education: A comparative study of urban and rural mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes toward technology integration in postpandemic China. Education and Information Technologies, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12890-x
Ma, Y. (2021). Reconceptualizing STEM education in China as praxis: A curriculum turn. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 4961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094961
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education (Final report). Australian Council of Learned Academies.
McLoughlin, C. (2013). Teacher professional learning in digital age environments. In S. J. T. & M. P. (Eds.), Back to the future: Legacies, continuities and changes in educational policy, practice and research(pp. 189–206). Sense Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-240-2_11
Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709–736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313
Merkle, A. C., Ferrell, L. K., Ferrell, O. C., & Hair, J. F., Jr. (2022). Evaluating e-book effectiveness and the impact on student engagement. Journal of Marketing Education, 44(1), 54–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753211035162
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Mohamed, K. I. E. S., & Nadia, K. I. E. S. (2024). Adapting to the transformation of education: New challenges for teachers. Journal of Languages and Translation, 4(1), 80–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70204/jlt.v4i1.310
Momani, M. A. K. A., Alharahasheh, K. A., & Alqudah, M. (2023). Digital learning in sciences education: A literature review. Cogent Education, 10(2), Article 2277007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2277007
Mouza, C. (2019). Beliefs, models, and practices on fostering teacher learning in technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 302–304.
Ohanu, I. B., & Chukwuone, C. A. (2018). Constraints to the use of online platform for teaching and learning technical education in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 3029–3045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9757-8
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. (2011). Assessing legitimation in mixed research: A new framework. Quality & Quantity, 45, 1253–1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9289-9
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
Safta-Zecheria, L., Negru, I. A., & Virag, F. H. (2020). Challenges experienced by teachers regarding access to digital instruments, resources, and competences in adapting the educational process to physical distancing measures at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania. Journal of Educational Sciences, 21, 69–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35923/JES.2020.2.05
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from “Education at a Glance 2020.” OECD Publishing.
Selwyn, N. (2019). What is digital sociology? John Wiley & Sons.
Sheridan, S., Lavigne, N., Mouza, C., & Pollock, L. (2019). Expanding an equitable pedagogy framework for teaching computer science: Reflections from the field. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, ON, Canada. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/1437726
Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(2), 57–67.
Songer, N. B. (2013). Digital resources versus cognitive tools: A discussion of learning science with technology. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 471–491). Routledge.
Sun, J. C. Y., & Metros, S. E. (2011). The digital divide and its impact on academic performance. Online Submission.
Takayama, K., & Lingard, B. (2021). How to achieve a “revolution”: Assembling the subnational, national and global in the formation of a new, “scientific” assessment in Japan. Globalization, Societies and Education, 19(2), 228–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1878016
Tiene, D. (2002). Addressing the global digital divide and its impact on educational opportunity. Educational Media International, 39(3–4), 212–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980210166440
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Triplett, W. J. (2023). Impact of technology integration in STEM education. Cybersecurity and Innovative Technology Journal, 1(1), 16–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53889/citj.v1i1.295
Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge—A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Wang, L. H., Chen, B., Hwang, G. J., Guan, J. Q., & Wang, Y. Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students’ learning achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00344-0
Watkins, D. (2012). Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural perspective. In D. E. (Ed.), School leadership and administration (pp. 61–76). Routledge.
Williams, J., & Lee, K. (2025). Teacher digital competence as a mediator in the effectiveness of digital tools for STEM education: A comparative study of four European and Asian education systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 78–96.
Wong, R. M., Sundararajan, N., Adesope, O. O., & Nishida, K. R. (2021). Static and interactive concept maps for chemistry learning. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 206–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1761299
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. (2022). The application of AI technologies in STEM education: A systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), Article 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00377-5
Yang, D., & Baldwin, S. J. (2020). Using technology to support student learning in an integrated STEM learning environment. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i1.22
Zawacki-Richter, O., Kerres, M., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Zhao, J., Wijaya, T. T., Mailizar, M., & Habibi, A. (2022). Factors influencing student satisfaction toward STEM education: Exploratory study using structural equation modeling. Applied Sciences, 12(19), Article 9717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199717
Zou, Y., & Fu, S. (2025). Navigating academic acculturation among international students: Peer network, advising, and field-specific challenges in STEM and non-STEM fields. Journal of International Students, 15(8), 161–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/72tbze06
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yazhou Li, Zhanyong Qi, Tingting Zhang, Kaile Liu, Chunmei Huang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
