Helping international master’s students navigate dissertation supervision: Research-informed discussion and awareness-raising activities

  • Nigel Harwood University of Sheffield
  • Bojana Petrić Birkbeck College
Keywords: dissertation writing, higher education, supervision, thesis writing, tutoring, academic support

Abstract

Drawing on a longitudinal case study of supervisees’ and supervisors’ experiences of master’s dissertation supervision in a U.K. university, we identify prominent themes and use excerpts from our data to design pedagogic activities to use in workshops with staff and students focused on supervisory practice. The activities ask workshop attendees to consider experiential supervisory narratives involving students’ social networks, problems interpreting supervisors’ feedback, problems with differing supervisor–supervisee role expectations, and problems with supervisor–supervisee miscommunication. Each scenario is followed by our literature-informed commentary. We argue that these empirically informed, grounded awareness-raising activities will alert supervisors and supervisees to common problems experienced during supervisory journeys, and will encourage them to consider their own supervisory expectations and practices more deeply.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Nigel Harwood, University of Sheffield

NIGEL HARWOOD, PhDis Reader in Applied Linguistics at the University of Sheffield, UK. His research interests include international students’ experiences with academic writing, citation analysis, and TESOL textbooks and teaching materials. He has published in various international journals across the disciplines of applied linguistics and higher education, including Journal of Pragmatics, Journal of Second Language Writing, Written Communication, and Studies in Higher Education. He has edited volumes with CUP and Palgrave Macmillan, and is co-editor of the Elsevier journal English for Specific Purposes.

Bojana Petrić, Birkbeck College

BOJANA PETRIĆ, PhD, is a senior lecturer in the Department of Applied Linguistics and Communication at Birkbeck, University of London. She has published in the area of academic writing, particularly source use and citing, in journals such as the Journal of Second Language Writing, Language Teaching, and Written Communication. She serves as the Deputy Chair of the European Association for the Teaching of Academic Writing and the Book Review Editor of the Journal of English for Academic Purposes.

References

Acker, S., Hill, T., & Black, E. (1994). Thesis supervision in the social sciences: Managed or negotiated? Higher Education, 28, 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383939

Aspland, T. (1999). “You learn round and I learn square”: Mei’s story. In Y. Ryan & O. Zuber-Skerritt (Eds.), Supervising postgraduates from non-English speaking backgrounds (pp. 25–39). Buckingham, United Kingdom: SRHE and Open University Press.

Blakeslee, A. M. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 11, 125–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651997011002001

Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Routledge.

Burns, R., Lamm, R., & Lewis, R. (1999). Orientations to higher degree supervision: A study of supervisors and students in education. In A. Holbrook & S. Johnston (Eds.), Supervision of postgraduate research in education (pp. 55–74). Coldstream, Victoria: Australian Association for Research in Education.

Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press.

Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dysthe, O. (2002). Professors as mediators of academic text cultures: An interview study with advisors and master’s degree students in three disciplines in a Norwegian university. Written Communication, 19, 493–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108802238010

Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into PhD supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500283585

Golde, C. (2010). Entering different worlds: Socialization into disciplinary communities. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education (pp. 79–95). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Grant, B., & Graham, A. (1994). “Guidelines for discussion”: A tool for managing postgraduate supervision. In O. Zuber-Skerritt & Y. Ryan (Eds.), Quality in postgraduate education (pp. 165–177). London: Kogan Page.

Grant, B. M. (2008). Agonistic struggle: Master–slave dialogues in humanities supervision. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 7, 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022207084880

Grant, B. M. (2010a). Fighting for space in supervision: Fantasies, fairytales, fictions and fallacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082483

Grant, B. M. (2010b). Improvising together: The play of dialogue in humanities supervision. Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 9, 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022210379376

Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500062953

Guerin, C., Kerr, H., & Green, I. (2015). Supervision pedagogies: Narratives from the field. Teaching in Higher Education, 20, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.957271

Halse, C. (2011). “Becoming a supervisor”: The impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594593

Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2017). Experiencing master’s supervision: Perspectives of international students and their supervisors. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Hockey, J. (1994). Establishing boundaries: Problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor’s role. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764940240211

Hockey, J. (1996). Strategies and tactics in the supervision of UK social science PhD students. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090409

Hockey, J. (1997). A complex craft: United Kingdom PhD supervision in the social sciences. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 2, 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596749700200004

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8

Kleijn, R. A. M., de Bronkhorst, L. H., Meijer, P. C., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Understanding the up, back, and forward-component in master’s thesis supervision with adaptivity. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 1463–1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.980399

Kleijn, R. A. M., de Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2015). Adaptive research supervision: Exploring expert thesis supervisors’ practical knowledge. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934331

Krase, E. (2007). “Maybe the communication between us was not enough”: Inside a dysfunctional advisor/L2 advisee relationship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.12.001

Kuwahara, N. (2008). It’s not in the orientation manual: How a first-year doctoral student learned to survive in graduate school. In C. P. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 186–200). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202

Lee, A. (2012). Successful research supervision: Advising students doing research. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Liu, L., Weiser, I., Silva, T., Alsup, J., Selfe, C., & Hawisher, G. (2008). It takes a community of scholars to raise one: Multiple mentors as key to my growth. In C. P. Casanave & X. Li (Eds.), Learning the literacy practices of graduate school: Insiders’ reflections on academic enculturation (pp. 166–183). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Manathunga, C. (2014). Intercultural postgraduate supervision: Reimagining time, place and knowledge. Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.

McAlpine, L., Paulson, J., Gonsalves, A., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2012). “Untold” doctoral stories: Can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559199

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). Education indicators in focus. Available at http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/EDIF%202013--N°14%20

Paltridge, B. (2004). The exegesis as a genre: an ethnographic investigation. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextualized frameworks (pp. 84–103). London: Continuum.

Salmon, P. (1992). Achieving a PhD—Ten students’ experience. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

Schneider, M. L., & Fujishima, N. K. (1995). When practice doesn’t make perfect: The case of a graduate ESL student. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 3–22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Seloni, L. (2012). Academic literacy socialization of first year doctoral students in US: A micro-ethnographic perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.05.004

Starfield, S., & Ravelli, L.J. (2006). “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.07.004

Taha, N., & Cox, A. (2016). International students’ networks: A case study in a UK university. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927851

Todd, M. J., Smith, K., & Bannister, P. (2006). Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: Staff experiences and perceptions. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500527693

Turner, G. (2015). Learning to supervise: Four journeys. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981840

UNESCO. (2016). Global flow of tertiary international students. Available at http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow

Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757592

Vilkinas, T. (2005). The supervisor’s role as manager of the PhD journey. In P. Green (Ed.), Supervising postgraduate research: Contexts and processes, theories and practices (pp. 163–177). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

Zappa-Hollman, S. (2007). Academic literacy socialization of Mexican exchange students at a Canadian university (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of British Columbia.

Zappa-Hollman, S., & Duff, P. A. (2015). Academic English socialization through individual networks of practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.188

Published
2019-01-08
How to Cite
Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2019). Helping international master’s students navigate dissertation supervision: Research-informed discussion and awareness-raising activities. Journal of International Students, 9(1), 150-171. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v9i1.276
Section
Research Articles