Interdisciplinary Transfer of Argumentation Skills: A Case Study on Academic Writing, Knowledge Integration, and Transferable Skills for STEM Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/vmyz0t09Keywords:
skill transfer, intercultural competence, writing across disciplines, interdisciplinary learning, STEM educationAbstract
This case study examines the transfer of argumentation skills from an English language development course to writing a literary research paper in a university literature course. It explores how explicit instruction in academic writing, argumentation, and intercultural awareness supports interdisciplinary learning, writing proficiency, and potential applications in STEM education. Data were collected through a personal diary and an interview. Findings suggest that structured instruction and interdisciplinary engagement help apply argumentation techniques across disciplines. The participant improved in constructing arguments, integrating evidence, and adapting writing for diverse audiences. Although based on a single case, this study highlights the pedagogical value of integrated curricula and explicit argumentation training. Future research could explore these processes across disciplines using triangulated methods.
References
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Barnes, M. E. (2020). Promoting student agency in writing. The Reading Teacher, 73(7), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1899
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. Parlor Press; The WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/books/referenceguides/bazerman-wac/
Belmonte, I. A., & McCabe, A. (2004). The development of written discourse competence in ELT materials: A preliminary analysis. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 29–48.
Bista, K., & Bista, R. (2025). Leveraging AI tools in academic writing: Insights from doctoral students on benefits and challenges. American Journal of STEM Education: Issues and Perspectives, 6, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.32674/9m8dq081
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (2020). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410251
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Snow, A. (2014). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4th ed.). Heinle ELT.
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (2003). Communicative competence: A pedagogical perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 592–616.
Ching Ching, K. C., & Mao, P. (2025). Effective strategies for teaching academic writing and literary reading: Perceptions and challenges of STEM students in Chinese higher education. American Journal of STEM Education: Issues and Perspectives, 6, 11–31. https://doi.org/10.32674/vp7zzd62
Creely, E. (2020). Students as writers – strengthening the agency of students as creative writers in the middle school. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 28(2), 7-18.
Creely, E., Henriksen, D., Crawford, R., & Henderson, M. (2021). Exploring creative risk-taking and productive failure in classroom practice. A case study of the perceived self-efficacy and agency of teachers at one school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100951
Davies, P. M., Passonneau, R. J., Muresan, S., & Gao, Y. (2021). Analytical techniques for developing argumentative writing in STEM: A pilot study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(3), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3116202
DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Diola, W. Y., Jalon, J. B., Jr., & Prudente, M. S. (2025). Exploring the use of claim-evidence-reasoning in promoting scientific reasoning skills of elementary school students. Anatolian Journal of Education, 10(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2025.10115a
Fletcher, J. (2018). Teaching literature rhetorically: Transferable literacy skills for 21st-century students. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032682709
Frank, A., Schulert, J., & Nicholas, H. (1992). Interdisciplinary learning as social learning and general education. European Journal of Education, 27(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/1503451
Genesee, F., & White, L. (2024). Multicompetence or multicompetencies: Investigating the human capacity for language learning. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 8(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.116
Germain, C. (2018). The neurolinguistic approach (NLA) for learning and teaching foreign languages: Theory and practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1978). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Hart, A., & Heaver, B. (2013). Evaluating resilience-based programs for schools using a systematic consultative review. Journal of Child and Youth Development, 1(1), 27-53. Retrieved from https://journals.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/index.php/jcyd/article/view/22
Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative learning: Mapping the terrain. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin Books.
Moon, J. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969212
Netten, J., & Germain, C. (2012). A new paradigm for the learning of a second or foreign language: The neurolinguistic approach. Neuroeducation, 1(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.24046/neuroed.20120101.85
Newell, W. H. (1999). The promise of integrative learning. About Campus, 4(2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/108648229900400205
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of Learning. In T. Husén, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., pp. 425-441). Pergamon.
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (2012). Knowledge to go: A motivational and dispositional view of transfer. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.693354
Philipp, T., & Schmohl, T. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook Transdisciplinary Learning (Higher Education: University Teaching & Research (6). Higher Education, University Teaching & Research. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839463475
Reynolds, M. (2020). Prismatic translation. Legenda.
Takona, J. P. (2025). Harmonizing STEM rigor and cultural responsiveness in college-level statistics: A review. American Journal of STEM Education: Issues and Perspectives, 8, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.32674/phxvdp70
Wang, K. D., Wu, Z., Tufts II, L., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., & Haber, N. (2024). Scaffold or crutch? Examining college students' use and views of generative AI tools for STEM education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.02653
Yin, R. K. (2014). The case study crisis: Some answers. In M. Tight (Ed.), SAGE benchmarks in social research methods: Case studies (Vol. 4, pp. III3–III3). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915480.n38
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
Yusupov, O., Abdazimov, A., Muradov, U., Kuchkeldiyeva, U., & Mirkasimova, M. (2021). Improving writing skills using communicative competence. International Journal of World Languages, 1(2). Retrieved from https://www.ejournals.id/index.php/IJWL/article/view/197
Call for Special Issue Proposals 






