Postdigital visual literacy

Visual entanglements and dynamic learning processes in art education

Authors

  • Charlotte Leonore Schwarz Universität Mozarteum Salzburg, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/n3gdq406

Keywords:

postdigital images, visual literacy, visual entanglements, art education, teaching-learning processes

Abstract

In a world permeated by images and confronted with social and ecological challenges, future-oriented education, in which technology plays a significant role in shaping processes, is becoming increasingly important. Digital media are transforming the methods and processes through which knowledge about the world is generated, necessitating a reorientation of educational practices. In this context, postdigital images have the potential to redesign teaching and learning processes in art education. By addressing and exploring the fluid nature of these images, art classes become spaces for shared knowledge exchange, in which postdigital visual literacy is not only taught but collaboratively developed by educators and learners alike.

Author Biography

  • Charlotte Leonore Schwarz, Universität Mozarteum Salzburg, Austria

    CHARLOTTE LEONORE SCHWARZ, M.Ed., is a research associate at the University Mozarteum Salzburg within the project Professionalisation in STEAM Career Transitions (ProQ-STEAM). Her research interests include postdigital visual cultures, art education, and the professionalization of career-changing and out-of-field teachers in art education.
    Email: charlotte_leonore.schwarz@moz.ac.at

References

Arvedsen, K., Mathiesen, F., & Billmayer, F. (2022). Didaktik für das Fach Kunst. Die visuelle Welt erleben, beobachten, denken, verstehen und gestalten [Art education didactics: Experiencing, observing, thinking, understanding, and shaping the visual world]. Fabrico Verlag.

Belbase, S., Bhesh, R. M., Wandee, K., Hassan, T., Munkhjargal, G., & Adeeb, J. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943

Bhatt, I. (2023). Postdigital literacies. In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of postdigital science and education (pp. 1–5). Springer. https://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4

Bocksch, R. (2022, March 24). Wie Jugendliche am liebsten kommunizieren [How young people prefer to communicate]. Statista. https://de.statista.com/infografik/11930/wie-jugendliche-am-liebsten-kommunizieren/

Burri, R. V. (2008). Bilder als soziale Praxis: Grundlegungen einer Soziologie des Visuellen [Images as social practice: Foundations of a sociology of the visual]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2008-0404

Böttger, T., & Zierer, K. (2024). To ban or not to ban? A rapid review on the impact of smartphone bans in schools on social well-being and academic performance. Education Sciences, 14(8), Article 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080906

Campbell, C., & Olteanu, A. (2023). The challenge of postdigital literacy: Extending multimodality and social semiotics for a new age. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(2), 572–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00414-8

Campbell, M., Edwards, E. J., Pennel, D., Poed, S., Lister, V., Gillett-Swan, J., Kelly, A., Zec, D., & Nguyen, T.(2024). Evidence for and against banning mobile phones in schools: A scoping review. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 34(3), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/20556365241270394

Cramer, F. (2014). What is "post-digital"? A Peer-Reviewed Journal About, 3(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.7146/aprja.v3i1.116068

Elkins, J. (Ed.). (2008). Visual literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939574

Farkas, M. (2012). Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213229

Farrell, L., Newman, T., & Corbel, C. (2020). Literacy and the workplace revolution: A social view of literate work practices in Industry 4.0. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(6), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1753016

Feierabend, S., Rathgeb, T., Kheredmand, H., & Glöckler, S. (2023). JIM-Studie 2023. Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger [JIM Study 2023: Youth, information, media. Basic study on media usage by 12- to 19-year-olds]. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2022/JIM_2023_web_final_kor.pdf

Graham, M. A. (2021). The disciplinary borderlands of education: Art and STEAM education. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 44(4), 769–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2021.1926163

Grájeda, A., Burgos, J., Córdova, P., & Sanjinés, A. (2023). Assessing student-perceived impact of using artificial intelligence tools: Construction of a synthetic index of application in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2287917

Gramsci, A. (1994). Gefängnishefte [Prison notebooks] (Vol. 7). Argument Verlag.

Grünwald, J. G. (2020). Kunstpädagogische Positionen: Vol. 49. Der Zweifel als produktive Möglichkeit in der kunstpädagogischen Praxis [Art education positions: Vol. 49. Doubt as a productive possibility in art education practice]. Universitätsdruckerei.

Hawley, S. (2024). Finding an (ecological) niche in the postdigital taskscape: The role of strong literacy and poor pedagogy in primary school pupils’ online literacy practices. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00478-0

Karakose, T., Tülübaş, T., & Papadakis, S. (2022). Revealing the intellectual structure and evolution of digital addiction research: An integrated bibliometric and science mapping approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214883

Kędra, J., & Žakevičiūtė, R. (2019). Visual literacy practices in higher education: What, why and how? Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(1–2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1580438

King, D. L., Radunz, M., Galanis, C. R., Quinney, B., & Wade, T. (2024). “Phones off while school’s on”: Evaluating problematic phone use and the social, wellbeing, and academic effects of banning phones in schools. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 13(4), 913–922. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2024.00058

Klein, K. (2019). Kunst und Medienbildung in der digital vernetzten Welt: Forschungsperspektiven im Anschluss an den Begriff der Postdigitalität [Art and media education in the digitally networked world: Research perspectives following the concept of postdigitality]. In K. Klein & W. Noll (Eds.), Postdigital landscapes (pp. 16–26). Zeitschrift Kunst Medien Bildung. https://zkmb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Postdigital-Landscapes.pdf

Lacković, N., Olteanu, A., & Campbell, C. (2024). Postdigital literacies in everyday life and pedagogic practices. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3), 796–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00500-5

Lin, H., & Chen, Q. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated educational applications and college students’ creativity and academic emotions: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions and attitudes. BMC Psychology, 12(1), Article 487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01979-0

Marotzki, W., & Jörissen, B. (2008). Wissen, Artikulation und Biographie: Theoretische Aspekte einer Strukturalen Medienbildung [Knowledge, articulation, and biography: Theoretical aspects of structural media education]. In J. Fromme & W. Sesink (Eds.), Pädagogische Medientheorie [Educational media theory] (pp. 51–70). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90971-4_4

Noë, A. (2023). The entanglement: How art and philosophy make us what we are. Princeton University Press.

Schmidt, R. (2020). Post-digitale Bildung [Post-digital education]. In M. Demantowsky, G. Lauer, R. Schmidt, & B. Wildt (Eds.), Was macht die Digitalisierung mit den Hochschulen? Einwürfe und Provokationen [How is digitalization changing universities? Reflections and provocations] (pp. 57–70). De Gruyter Brill. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110673265-005

Schütze, K. (2019). Bildlichkeit nach dem Internet—Kunstvermittlung am Bild als Gegenwartsbewältigung [Imagery after the Internet—Art education through images as a way of coping with the present]. In K. Klein & W. Noll (Eds.), Postdigital landscapes (pp. 125–133). Zeitschrift Kunst Medien Bildung. https://zkmb.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Postdigital-Landscapes.pdf

Shiri, M., & Baigutov, K. (2024). Exploring the influence of teachers’ academic rank in advancing inclination to TPACK in art education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, Article 101252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101252

Shiri, M., & Baigutov, K. (2025). The digital shift in art education: Balancing tradition, innovation, and integration. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 16(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2025-0019

Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

Tülübaş, T., Karakose, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). A holistic investigation of the relationship between digital addiction and academic achievement among students. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(10), 2006–2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13100143

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

Issue

Section

Art and Technology in STEM

How to Cite

Schwarz, C. L. (2025). Postdigital visual literacy: Visual entanglements and dynamic learning processes in art education. American Journal of STEM Education, 14, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.32674/n3gdq406