Object in View

Understanding International Students’ Participation in Group Work

Keywords: activity theory, English for Academic Purposes, international students, object in view, United Kingdom


The literature on international student participation in Anglo-Western universities is predicated on an assumption of underachievement. Reductive understandings prevail with English language competence and cultural background highlighted. Drawing from a case study of group work in a first-year module in a management course at an internationalizing university in the United Kingdom, this article explores students’ perceptions of the impact of English language competence on participation. The case study, which aimed at a holistic understanding, adopted an activity theoretical framework for modeling participation and for analyzing focus group data. Four educational objects were identified with the construct “object in view” employed in recognition of the plurality of the object. The in-depth analysis focused on the object. Although focus groups traversed a range of topics, English language competence was widely discussed. However, the analysis suggests that the extent English language was perceived as an issue was relative to the object in view.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

John Straker, University of Exeter, UK

JOHN STRAKER, EdD, is an Associate Research Fellow in the College of Social Sciences and International Studies at the University of Exeter and program manager of the English language skills development program, INTO University of Exeter. His main professional and research interest is facilitating international student participation in degree programs. His current research explores the utility of activity theory as a framework for understanding and researching international student participation


Ballard, B., & Clanchy, J. (1991). Teaching students from overseas: A brief guide for lecturers and supervisors. Longman Cheshire.

Barron, P. (2006). Stormy outlook? Domestic students’ impression of international students and an Australian university. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 2(2), 5–22.

Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.

Biggs, J. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian heritage learning culture. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 45–67). Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.

British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/bera-ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2011

Brown, S., & Jones, E. (2007). Introduction: Values, valuing and value in an internationalised Higher Education context. In E. Jones & B. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 1–6). Routledge.

Carroll, J. (2005a). “Lightening the load”: Teaching in English, learning in English. In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving education for all (pp. 35–42). Routledge.

Carroll, J. (2005b). Multicultural groups for discipline-specific tasks. In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving education for all (pp. 84–91). Routledge.

Carroll, J. (2015). Tools for teaching in an educationally mobile world. Routledge.

Chanock, K. (2010). The right to reticence. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 543–552.

De Vita, G. (2007). Taking stock: An appraisal of the literature on internationalising HE learning. In E. Jones & B. Brown (Eds.), Internationalising higher education (pp. 154–168). Routledge.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinem, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

Fisher, R. (2007). Talking of talk: How exploration of the object can illuminate participants’ understanding of classroom discourse. In R. Alanen & S. Pöyhönen (Eds.), Language in action: Vygotsky and Leontievian legacy today (pp. 223–244). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Freeman, K., & Li, M. (2019). “We are a ghost in the class”: First year international students’ experiences in the Global Contact Zone. Journal of International Students, 9(1), 19–38.

Gu, Q. (2009). Maturity and interculturality: Chinese students’ experiences in UK higher education. European Journal of Education, 44(1), 37–52.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2015). The future of JEAP and EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, A1–A4.

Harrison, N., & Peacock, N. (2010). Interactions in the international classroom: The UK perspective. In E. Jones (Ed.), Internationalisation and the student voice (pp. 125–142). Routledge.

Hedegaard, M. (2001). Learning through acting within societal traditions: Learning in classrooms. In M. Hedegaard (Ed.), Learning in classrooms: A cultural historical approach (pp. 15–25). Aarhus University Press.

Hiruma, F., Wells, G., & Ball, T. (2007). The problem of discoursing in Activity. An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 1, 93–114.

Hsieh, M. (2007). Challenges for international students in higher education: One student’s narrated story of invisibility and struggle. College Student Journal, 41(2), 379–391.

Hsu, C., & Huang, I. (2017). Are international students quiet in class? The influence of teacher confirmation on classroom apprehension and willingness. Journal of International Students, 7(1), 38–52.

Hyland, K. (2006). Writing in the academy: Reputation, education and knowledge. Institute of Education, University of London.

Jackson, E., & Huddart, T. (2010). Curriculum design based on home students’ interpretations of internationalisation. ARECLS, 7, 80–112.

Jones, J. (1999). From silence to talk: Cross-cultural ideas on students’ participation in academic group discussion. English for Specific Purposes, 18(3), 243–259.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Problematizing cultural stereotypes in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 709–718.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Lee, E. L. (2007). Linguistic and cultural factors in East Asian students’ oral participation in U.S. university classrooms. International Education, 36(3), 29–47.

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall.

Louie, K. (2005). Gathering cultural knowledge: Useful or use with care? In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving education for all (pp. 17–25). Routledge.

Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2011). Ideas for intercultural education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Marlina, R. (2009). “I don’t talk or I decide not to talk? Is it my culture?” International students’ experiences of tutorial participation. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 235–244.

Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 60–70.

Mclean, P., & Ransom, L. (2005). Building intercultural competencies. In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving education for all (pp. 45–62). Routledge.

Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 573–603.

Osmond, J., & Roed, J. (2010). Sometimes It means more work ... Student perceptions of group work in a mixed cultural setting. In E. Jones (Ed.), Internationalisation and the student voice (pp. 113–124). Routledge.

Ramsay, S., Barker, M., & Jones, E. (1999). Academic adjustment and learning processes: A comparison of international and local students in first-year university. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 129–144.

Ryan, J., & Hellmundt, S. (2005). Maximising international students’ cultural capital. In J. Carroll & J. Ryan (Eds.), Teaching international students: Improving education for all (pp. 13–16). Routledge.

Ryan, J., & Louie, K. (2007). False dichotomy? “Western” and “Confucian” concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 404–417.

Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Straker, J. (2014). A case study of international student participation in an undergraduate module in management in a UK business school using the lens of activity theory [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Exeter, UK.

Straker, J. (2016). International student participation in higher education: Changing the focus from ‘international students’ to ‘participation’. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(4), 299–318.

Stubbs, M., Robinson, B., & Twite, S. (1979). Observing classroom language. Open University.

Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2008). Students’ attitudes towards culturally mixed groups on international campuses: Impact of participation in diverse and non-diverse groups. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 357–370.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press

Thom, V. (2010). Mutual cultures: Engaging with interculturalism in higher education. In E. Jones (Ed.), Internationalisation and the student voice (pp. 155–168). Routledge.

Trahar, S. (2010). Has everybody seen a swan? Stories from the internationalised classroom. In E. Jones (Ed.), Internationalisation and the student voice (pp. 143–154). Routledge.

Turner, J. (2004). Language as academic purpose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(2), 95–109

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Zhu, Y., & Bresnahan, M. (2018). “They make no contribution!” versus “We should make friends with them!”—American domestic students’ perception of Chinese international students’ reticence and face. Journal of International Students, 8(4), 1614–1635.

How to Cite
Straker, J. (2020). Object in View. Journal of International Students, 10(4), 1040-1063. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10i4.1370
Research Articles