Preparing students for AI-powered learning:: The mediating power of self-efficacy between holistic engagement and digital readiness

Ulfat Rasoli; Smiju I.S.

doi:10.32674/ppgcph83

Authors

Ulfat Rasoli Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2259-5033
Smiju I.S. Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/ppgcph83

Keywords:

GenAI Tools, Student Engagement, Self-Efficacy, Digital Readiness, Cognitive Engagement, Behavioural Engagement, Emotional Engagement, Agile Pedagogy

Abstract

Integrating digital platforms and generative AI into higher education requires an understanding of the psychological factors that influence student adaptation. In this study, 338 students were surveyed to explore how engagement (emotional, behavioral, and cognitive), self-efficacy, and digital readiness interact, using adapted scales and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results indicate that engagement strongly affects digital readiness (β = .55, p < .001) and self-efficacy (β = .83, p < .001). Self-efficacy predicts readiness (β = .31, p < .001) and mediates the relationship between engagement and readiness (β = .25). In the GenAI era, self-confidence is as crucial as technical skills for digital adaptation in education. The study recommends frameworks such as the Agile Pedagogy to increase confidence and support adaptation.

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002

Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), Article 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Bruning, R. H., Dempsey, M. S., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38.

Chuaphun, P., & Samanchuen, T. (2024). Exploring success factors and relationships in virtual learning using ISM and fuzzy MICMAC analysis. Heliyon, 10(7).

ElSayary, A. (2023). Harnessing artificial intelligence tools to enhance smart learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(2), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.2.25

Ergun, E., & Adibatmaz, F. B. K. (2020). Exploring the predictive role of e-learning readiness and e-learning style on student engagement. Open Praxis, 12(2), 175–189.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hidayat-Ur-Rehman, I. (2024). Digital competence and students’ engagement: A comprehensive analysis of smartphone utilization, perceived autonomy and formal digital learning as mediators. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 461–488.

Hong, A. J., & Kim, H. J. (2018). College students’ digital readiness for academic engagement (DRAE) scale. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27, 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0387-0

Hong, K. S., & Gardner, L. A. (2018). The relationship between students’ digital readiness and academic engagement: A study of Australian higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3142

Huang, X., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Benefits of adding self-explanation prompts to worked examples in multimedia learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 61, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.006

Iyer, P. (2024). Enhancing student engagement using artificial intelligence (AI) and chatbots like ChatGPT. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://open-publishing.org/journals/index.php/jutlp/article/view/6989

Li, W., Zhang, X., Li, J., Yang, X., Li, D., & Liu, Y. (2024). An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 level: An extension of the classic TAM model. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 13922. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64363-3

Liang, Y., Chen, Y., & Huang, R. H. (2023). Digital methods to promote inclusive and effective learning environments for students with special educational needs: A systematic review. Open Education Studies, 5(1), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0023

Mitchell, K. M., McMillan, D. E., Lobchuk, M. M., Nickel, N., & Rabbani, R. (2021). Development and validation of the SAWSES. Assessing Writing, 48, Article 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100524

Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Enhancing student engagement through artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6), 1–13.

Parkes, M., Stein, S., & Reading, C. (2015). Student preparedness for university e-learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.002

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7

Schuett, K. (2024). Spiritual formation and 'attention economy': Exploring facilitators' engagement in learning and one's spiritual life. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 6(1), 205–220. https://ijrss.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/505

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50003-6

Tsai, M. J., Liang, J. C., Hou, H. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students’ self-efficacy and Internet self-efficacy in online learning environments: A study of college students. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 124–134.

Ulfert-Blank, A. S., & Schmidt, I. (2022). Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development. Computers & Education, 191, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626

van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100

Wolverton, C. C., Hollier, B. N. G., & Lanier, P. A. (2020). The impact of computer self-efficacy on student engagement and group satisfaction in online business courses. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 18(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.006

Zheng, L., & Li, X. (2020). The effectiveness of online learning on students’ emotional engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1420–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12926

Zhu, W. (2022). Share and embrace demographic and location diversity to create an inclusive online learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1424–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13272

Zhu, Z. (2022). A systematic review of higher-order thinking by visualizing its structure through HistCite and CiteSpace software. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00614-5

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00325-8

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. (Original work published in 2019; updated in 2023). https://curriculumredesign.org/

Sailer, M., Stadler, M., Bedenlier, S., & Fischer, F. (2024). Digital readiness and students’ use of generative AI in higher education: The role of self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 205, 104942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104942

Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Digital competence and professional development for teachers in the era of AI: A framework and review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10177-3