Remittances, Export Performance, and Policy Frameworks in a Developing Economy
Countering the Dutch Disease Hypothesis in Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/6ysx4t52Keywords:
ARDL bounds testing, cointegration, Dutch disease, error-correction model, real effective exchange rateAbstract
This study purpose to test whether larger remittance inflow supports or weakens Nepal’s export competitiveness. Annual data from 1994-2024 were used in this study, applying the export-centric ARDL bounds model with ECM and full diagnostics, modelling aggregate exports against remittance, GDP, import, and CPI. The data series are mixed I (0)/ I (1), cointegration is confirmed, and the error-correction term is found to be strong, indicating rapid adjustments. The result shows remittances have a positive but statistically insignificant effect on exports in the short and long run, providing macro-level insight into Dutch-Disease type crowding out. Export moves together with GDP and depend on imported intermediates. Remittance Granger causes imports but not exports. Stability, normality, and specification tests are stable. Thus, it concludes that Nepal’s challenge is not remittance-induced harm to tradables, but rather its failure to convert household savings into exportable capacity.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Interdisciplinary Journal of Innovation in Nepalese Academia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Upon publication articles are immediately and freely available to anyone, anywhere, at any time. All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License. All articles are permanently available online. The final version of articles may be posted to an institutional repository or to the author's own website as long as the article includes a link back to the original article posted on OJED.





