The Retrograde Pendulum: Reversing Course on Standards-based Grading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/7an6dt57Keywords:
Standards-based grading, Grading reform, Educational Leadership, Grade inflationAbstract
This commentary details one large, suburban school district that, after a decade-long commitment to implementing standards-based grading (SBG), reversed course, abandoned the initiative, and returned to traditional grading. This article provides a postmortem of the ambitious reform effort, drawing upon previous research and recent district survey data from teachers and parents. Among the factors leading to the reform's reversal are that, despite a carefully planned, multi-year rollout, the initiative was unable to resolve persistent concerns about implementation inconsistency, student motivation, and the technology reporting platform. Internal pressures were exacerbated by external turmoil, including personnel turnover and the COVID-19 pandemic, and district leadership ultimately acquiesced to widespread faculty and staff dissatisfaction with reporting measures, grade inflation, and ineffective communication of student progress. This district's experience offers important lessons for school leaders, emphasizing that systemic change requires fidelity of implementation accompanied by cultural adoption, long-term resilience and adaptability measures, and a commitment to instructional integrity.
Downloads
References
Blackwelder, A. (2020, May 24). Grading in the new normal w/ Jay Percell. Grow Beyond Grades. https://growbeyondgrades.org/blog/episode-20
Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003
Denham, R. (2019, December 11). New grading model met with confusion, pushback in unit 5 high schools. WGLT.org. https://www.wglt.org/show/wglts-sound-ideas/2019-12-11/new-grading-model-met-with-confusion-pushback-in-unit-5-high-schools
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Guskey, T. R., & Brookhart, S. M. (Eds.). (2019). What we know about grading: What works, what doesn't, and what's next. ASCD.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2020). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (5th ed.). Pearson.
Hatch, K. (2020, April 17). How do we grade during the shutdown? “Do no harm” is the answer. Association of Washington Principals. https://awsp.org/connect/blog/blog-detail/how-do-we-grade-during-the-shutdown-do-no-harm-is-the-answer/
Mehra, A. (2024, June 4). There’s a more equitable way to grade: Districts should invest in it. Edsurge. https://edsource.org/2024/theres-a-more-equitable-way-to-grade-districts-should-invest-in-it/713086
O'Connor, K. (2018). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards (4th ed.). Corwin.
Percell, J. C., & Meyer, B. B. (2021). Resolutions for a new paradigm: Addressing common issues in standards-based grading. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 57(4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2021.1968692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2021.1968692
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of School Administration Research and Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.
.png)