The Four-Hour Grading Scale: Motivation, Self-Determination, and Academic Achievement in Raising Graduation Rates

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/cnjh3t69

Keywords:

educational policy, educational psychology, grading, graduation rate, high schools, motivation, principals

Abstract

High school administrators desire a high graduation rate, and government actors and community members pressure administrators to raise this rate. In the context of this challenging dynamic, principals sometimes compel teachers to alter their grading practices. While amending grading practices may provide the impression of improvement, it is inauthentic and likely ineffective in producing achievement results. Although changing grading practices can increase graduation rates, it does not improve achievement; however, increasing motivation can. Self-determination theory (SDT) research has found that incorporating the principles of SDT can increase students’ academic achievement. This essay reviews SDT and the seven autonomy-supportive instructional behaviors (ASIBs), arguing that they are a more achievement-focused alternative to increasing graduation rates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Leo W. Cavinder, Indiana University, Bloomington

    LEO W. CAVINDER is an undergraduate student at Indiana University Bloomington studying Political Science and Education Policy. His research examines grading practices from a policy and law perspective, graduation rates, and the role of motivation in schools. Email: lcavinde@iu.edu  

References

Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., Kabbani, N. S. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspectives: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College Record, 103(5), 760–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00134

Bowers, A. J. (2009). Reconsidering grades as data for decision making: More than just academic knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910981080

Bowers, A. J. (2010). Grades and graduation: A longitudinal risk perspective to identify student dropouts. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903382970

Bowers, A. J. (2011). What’s in a grade? The multidimensional nature of what teacher-assigned grades assess in high school. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(3), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2011.597112

Bowers, A. J. (2020). Towards measures of different and useful aspects of schooling: Why schools need both teacher-assigned grades and standardized assessments. In S. M. Brookhart & J. H. McMillian (Eds.), Classroom assessment and educational measurement (pp. 209–223). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507533-12

Bowers, A. J., & Sprott, R. (2012). Examining the multiple trajectories associated with dropping out of high school: A growth mixture model analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(3), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.552075

Brookhart, S. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00182.x

Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb01070.x

Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement of Education, 7(4), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0704_2

Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillian, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M. T., & Welsh, M. E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069

Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Guay, F. (2021). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426

Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474

Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X

Chen, P. P., & Bonner, S. M. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about grading practices and a constructivist approach to teaching. Educational Assessment, 22(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1271703

Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). When teachers learn how to provide classroom structure in an autonomy-supportive way: Benefits to teachers and their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103004

Deci, E. L., Spiegel, N. H., Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Kauffman, M. (1982). Effects of performance standards on teaching styles: behavior of controlling teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(6), 852–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.852

Fitzsimmons, S. J., Cheever, J., Leonard, E., & Macunovich, D. (1969). School failures: Now and tomorrow. Developmental Psychology, 1(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027088

Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The Influence of teacher and peer relationships on students’ classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. Teachers College Record, 116(13), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601319

Griffin, R., & Townsley, M. (2021). Points, points, and more points: High school grade inflation and deflation when homework and employability scores are included. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v6i1.3460

Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

Kramer, S. L., Posner, M. A., Browman, A. S., Lawrence, N. R., Roem, J., & Krier, K. (2024). The impacts of a standards-based grading system emphasizing formative assessment, feedback, and re-assessment: A mixed methods, cluster randomized control trial in ninth grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2287594

Kunnath, J. P. (2017). Teacher grading decisions: Influences, rationale, and practices. American Secondary Education, 45(3), 68–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45147907

Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2016). A public health perspective on school dropout and adult outcomes: A prospective study of risk and protective factors from Age 5 to 27 Years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 652–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.01.014

Link, L. J., & Guskey, T. R. (2022). Is standards-based grading effective? Theory Into Practice, 61(4), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2022.2107338

Lloyd, D. N. (1978). Prediction of school failure from third-grade data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(4), 1193–1200. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800442

McFarland, J., Cui, J., Holmes, J., & Wang, X. (2020). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 2019, compendium report (NCES 2020–117). National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602216.pdf

McMillan, J. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x

McMillan, J. H., & Nash, S. (2000). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practices decision making [Paper presentation]. NCME 2000 Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447195.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). High school graduation rates [Condition of education]. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/pdf/2024/coi_508c.pdf

Nichols, S. L., & Harris, L. R. (2016). Accountability assessment’s effects on teachers and schools. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 40–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749136

Olsen, B., & Buchana, R. (2019). An investigation of teachers encouraged to reform grading practices in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 2004–2039. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219841349

Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186

Randall, J. & Engelhard, G. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008

Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teacher’s autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f

Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., Cheon, S. H., Matos, L., & Kaplan, H. (2022). Supporting students’ motivation: Strategies for success. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003091738

Rumberger, R. W. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Harvard University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychology needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Four-year adjusted-cohort graduation rate and cohort count (2021–2022) [Data set]. ED Data Express. Retrieved September 13, 2024, from https://eddataexpress.ed.gov/download/data-library

Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032359

Downloads

Published

2025-11-13

Issue

Section

Best Practice Articles

How to Cite

The Four-Hour Grading Scale: Motivation, Self-Determination, and Academic Achievement in Raising Graduation Rates. (2025). Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 10(2), 112-117. https://doi.org/10.32674/cnjh3t69