Empowering minds, transforming lives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/mjb0nr49Keywords:
literature-based reading instruction; reading comprehension; CICL; rehabilitationAbstract
This study evaluated a university-led community extension program using literature-based reading instruction to improve comprehension among children in conflict with the law (CICL) at a rehabilitation center for youth in Cebu, Philippines. Using a quasi-experimental design, significant gains were observed in lexical (t = 0.03) and critical (t = 0.01) comprehension across grades 0–3, 4–6, 7–8, and 11–12, whereas grades 9–10 showed no significant improvement. The program enhanced vocabulary and analytical skills but had a limited impact on interpretive and creative comprehension. The findings highlight the value of facilitator-supported instruction and call for more tailored strategies. This study affirms that reading is a rehabilitative tool and urges further research on long-term and socioemotional literacy factors.
References
Abdelaal, N. M., & Sase, A. S. (2014). Relationship between prior knowledge and reading comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(6), 125-133.
Abid, N., Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A. A., & Kumar, T. (2023). Relationships among students’ reading habits, study skills, and academic achievement in English at the secondary level. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1020269.
Al Roomy, M. A. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Critical Reading Skills on Students' Reading Comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 366-381.
Anderson, L. L., Meline, M., & Harn, B. (2023). Student engagement within adolescent reading comprehension interventions: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education, 203(2), 258-268.
Brady, S. (2020). A 2020 perspective on research findings on alphabetics (phoneme awareness and phonics): Implications for instruction. The Reading League Journal, 1(3), 20-28.
Brunette, N. (2019). The effects of shared reading interventions on language outcomes in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders.
Clark, R., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American educator, 36(1), 5-11.
De-la-Peña, C., & Luque-Rojas, M. J. (2021). Levels of reading comprehension in higher education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 712901.
El Motabit, A. (2020). Evaluating the lexical load of the reading comprehension texts in EFL textbooks. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(1), 42-53.
El Xiane Mae, L., Casinabe, K. J. R., Catingan, C. B., Marielle, J., Elleso, I. M. H., & Quiño-Justol, J. Improving the Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 Pupils Through Pre-Teaching Vocabulary and Repeated Reading.
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11.
Fan, M., & Cai, W. (2022). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? An examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Current Psychology, 41(7), 4667-4676.
Fergina, A., Ghazy, A., Prancisca, S., Aminah, S., & Ananda, E. Enhancing Reading Comprehension Through Extensive Reading. Journal of English Education Program, 5(2).
Figueroa-Macias, E. M., & Andrade-Zambrano, C. D. (2022). Reading comprehension in the development of communication skills in high school students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 8(4), 175-182.
Habibian, M., Roslan, S., Idris, K., & Othman, J. (2015). The Role of Psychological Factors in the Process of Reading. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(29), 114-123.
Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609.
Hudson, A. K., & Walker, M. (2017). Supporting Effective Guided Reading Instruction for All Students. Texas Association for Literacy Education Yearbook, 4, 67-71.
Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & McCrudden, M. T. (2023, April). The effects of text structure on students’ use of comprehension strategies and cognitive outcomes during science text processing. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1112804). Frontiers Media SA.
Juvenile Delinquency in the Philippines: Is Juvenile Justice Fair? (2022) Business Mirror
Kahveci, H. (2023). The Positive and Negative Effects of Teacher Attitudes and Behaviors on Student Progress. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1), 290-306.
Kamagi, S. (2020, October). A study on students’ ability in literal and inferential comprehension of english texts. In Journal of International Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 140-144).
Kispal, A. (2008). Effective Teaching of Inference Skills for Reading. Literature Review. Research Report DCSF-RR031. National Foundation for Educational Research. The Mere, Upton Park, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 2DQ, UK.
Klimova, B., & Zamborova, K. (2020). Use of mobile applications in developing reading comprehension in second language acquisition—A review study. Education Sciences, 10(12), 391.
Lofranco, C. C., & Luzano, R. A. (2023). Factors Affecting the Reading Performance of the Junior High School Learners. Factors Affecting the Reading Performance of the Junior High School Learners, 124(1), 25-25.
Maeda, J. (2017). Self-efficacy reduces impediments to classroom discussion for international students: Fear, embarrassment, social isolation, judgment, and discrimination. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 141-159.
McEwan, E. K. (2007). Teach the seven strategies of highly effective readers. EK McEwan, 40, 6-12.
Miñoza, M. V., & Montero, M. A. (2019). Reading Comprehension Level among Intermediate Learners. Online Submission, 31(3), 561-568.
Mulcahy, E., Bernardes, E., & Baars, S. (2016). The relationship between reading age, education and life outcomes. LKMco–The Education and Youth “Think and-Action” Tank.
Nurjanah, R. L., & Putri, S. R. (2022, June). The effect of literal comprehension on the higher levels of comprehension in reading skill: a longitudinal case study. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 5, pp. 471-476).
Pellicer-Sánchez, A., Webb, S., & Wang, A. (2024). How does lexical coverage affect the processing of L2 texts?. Applied Linguistics, 45(6), 953-972.
Putri, M. E. (2020). Creative Comprehension on Literacy: Technology and Visual. ICoSEEH 2019, 4, 324-328.
Rice, M., Wijekumar, K., Lambright, K., & Bristow, A. (2024). Inferencing in reading comprehension: Examining variations in definition, instruction, and assessment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1169-1190.
Roksa, J., Trolian, T. L., Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2017). Facilitating academic performance in college: understanding the role of clear and organized instruction. Higher Education, 74, 283-300.
Saputra, D. G., & Al Haddar, G. (2024). Enhancing Reading Comprehension in Education: A Study on the Effec-tiveness of the SQ3R Method. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 13(3), 167-179.
Shah, S. R., & Udgaonkar, U. S. (2018). Influence of gender and age of teachers on teaching: Students perspective. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1), 2436-2441.
Smith, K. (2022). Interventions for young readers: A literature review with evidence-based strategies to practice. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 11(1), 49-60.
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240.
Sun, H. (2020). Unpacking reading text complexity: A dynamic language and content approach. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 20(2).
Toyon, M. A. S. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 10(5), 253-260.
Valdez, S. J. P., Esteban, J. F., Vinluan, J. B., Ramat, G. A., & De Guzman, M. P. V. (2023). Reading as valued by Filipino secondary students: Its role in life. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(6).
van der Sande, L., van Steensel, R., Fikrat-Wevers, S., & Arends, L. (2023). Effectiveness of interventions that foster reading motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 21.
Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Williams, K. J., Miciak, J., Fall, A. M., & Roberts, G. (2019). Efficacy of a high school extensive reading intervention for English learners with reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 373.
Vicente-Yagüe Jara, M. I. D., García Guirao, P., Jiménez-Pérez, E. D. P., & López Martínez, O. (2023). Reading and writing skills: cognitive, emotional, creative, and digital approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1279276.
Wang, X. W., Zhu, Y. J., & Zhang, Y. C. (2022). An empirical study of college students’ reading engagement on academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1025754.
Webb, S. (2021). Research investigating lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don’t know, and what needs to be examined.
Wharton-McDonald, R., & Erickson, J. (2017). Reading comprehension in the middle grades: Characteristics, challenges, and effective supports.
William, B., Lara, D., & Lola, D. (2025). The Effect of Reading Interventions and Programs on Literacy Rates in Philippine Elementary Schools.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ma. Cristilina Montañez, Rachel Camilo, Luiscel Teofi Cabico, Aileen Cuevas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




