ICT tools and their associations with research activities, students’ assessment practices, and administrative decision-making in private universities in North-Central Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/azsa7w29Keywords:
academic evaluation, administrative decision-making, digital transformation, education management information systems (EMIS), higher education management, information and communication technology (ICT), private universities, research productivityAbstract
This study examined the statistical associations between Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools and research activities, students’ assessment practices, and administrative decision-making in private universities in North-Central Nigeria. A cross-sectional correlational design was adopted. The population comprised 62,950 undergraduate students and academic staff from 32 private universities, with 700 respondents (500 students and 200 academic staff) selected from eight universities using stratified sampling. Data were collected using the researcher-designed ITETORADQ questionnaire, validated by experts (CVI = 0.73), with a pilot reliability coefficient of 0.77. Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation and simple linear regression were used at the 0.05 significance level. Findings showed strong positive associations with research activities (r = .865), assessment practices (r = .830), and administrative decision-making (r = .848).
References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. 31(2), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Alenezi, M. (2021). Deep dive into digital transformation in higher education institutions. Education Sciences, 11(12), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120770
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics' behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120
Attuquayefio, S. N. (2022). Information and communication technology (ICT) adoption in higher education. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 12(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJVPLE.295309
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.).
Bolaji, H. O., & Ajape, R. O. (2022). Information and communication technology as a veritable tool for administrators in university: From teaching perspectives to challenge in education. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(2), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v2i2.50151
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dawson, P. (2021). Defending assessment security in a digital world: preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324178
Doneva, R., Gaftandzhieva, S., & Bandeva, S. (2021). Data analytics tools in higher education. In A. Eskenazi, G. Totkov, I. Koychev, & K. Ivanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Education and Research in the Information Society (ERIS 2021) (Vol. 3061, pp. 91-99). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.55630/eris.2021.3061.91-99
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for mandatory online assessment in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. In D. Burgos, A. Tlili, & A. Tabacco (Eds.), Radical solutions for education in a crisis context (pp. 85-98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
Ibrahim, A. W., Taura, A. A., Iliyasu, A., & Rabiu, A. U. (2023). Digitalising educational assessments in a Nigerian university: An Examination of undergraduate students' digital behaviours and experiences. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2). 47-56
https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/110202
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics for study success in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2773-2794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Inayati, N. L., Al Mubarok, F. U., & Rohmani, A. F. (2026). Enhancing critical thinking and self-directed learning through integration of digital competence and didactic strategy in higher education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.32674/whffna77
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Khotimah, K., Djatmika, E. T., Utaya, S., & Atmoko, A. (2026). Drivers of teachers' pedagogical competence in the digital era: A meta-analysis of educational technology integration, organizational support, and self-efficacy. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(5), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.32674/3yzs2g64
Mabotha, P. A. P., & Ngcamu, B. S. (2026). Digital transformation in the higher education sector: A systematic literature review. Administrative Sciences, 16(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16010001
Ng'ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., & Wood, D. (2016). Technology enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education - A rearview of a 20-year journey: 20 years reflection on technology enhanced learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 843-858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12485
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). OECD digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(Suppl. 1), S45-S47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169
Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment: Towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79-96.
Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952
Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., Lokuge Dona, K., Eichhorn, K., Fluck, A., Huang, R., Bridges, S., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Gui, X., Deneen, C. C., San Diego, J., & Gibson, D. C. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 58-71.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology: How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
Teoh, K. B., & Tan, W. L. (2026). Policy alignment and trustworthy AI governance in higher education: A conceptual analysis of Malaysia's reform agenda and ASEAN governance imperatives. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 15(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.32674/eqphhh11
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. International Commission on the Futures of Education.
UNESCO. (2021a). The integration of Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) with other information systems. UNESCO Office Santiago and UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
UNESCO. (2021b). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. International Commission on the Futures of Education.
UNESCO. (2025). Education management information systems: Progress assessment tool for transformation (EMIS-PATT). https://www.unesco.org/en/education-management/emis-patt
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, and applications. George Braziller.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juliana Omobolanale Onwughai, Olumide Agbede, Justin Ogah Ushie, Precious Jennifer Chinyere Nnaedozie

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




