How Interdisciplinarians Work

  • Sharon Woodill University of Central Florida
  • Richard Plate University of Central Florida
  • Nathan Jagoda University of Central Florida
Keywords: interdisciplinary studies, interdisciplinary methodology, complexity

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research requires an approach different from research performed within a specific disciplinary framework. This paper reports on a study that was motivated by a perceived difference between how interdisciplinary research is done by scholars and how it is taught to students. A total of 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with professional scholars who had presented at one of the Association for Interdisciplinary Studies recent annual conferences with the objective of exploring how professional scholars approach and perform interdisciplinary research. Three themes that arose from these interviews—1) the importance of an exploratory disposition, 2) a lack of concern for interdisciplinary boundaries, and 3) the importance of mentorship and community—have relevance in terms of how we design curriculum and educational experiences to prepare students to research complex, real-world problems that require an interdisciplinary approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sharon Woodill, University of Central Florida

Sharon Woodill, PhD, is a Lecturer in Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Central Florida, USA. Her research interests include Interdisciplinary Methodologies, Secular Studies, Science, Religion and Sexualities, and Feminist Science Studies. Email: Sharon.Woodill@ucf.edu

Richard Plate, University of Central Florida

Richard Plate, PhD, is a Lecturer in Environmental Studies and Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Central Florida, USA. His research focuses on how people learn and make decisions about complex social-ecological systems. Email: Richard.Plate@ucf.edu

Nathan Jagoda, University of Central Florida

Nathan Jagoda, MA, is a research assistant in Sociology and Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Central Florida, USA. Email: Nathanjagoda@Knights.ucf.edu

References

Abbott, W., & Nantz, K. A. (2012). Building students’ integrative thinking

capacities:

A case study in economics and history.” Issues in Integrative Studies, 30, 19–47.

Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: Integration and

implementation

sciences for researching complex real-world problems. Canberra: ANU E Press.

Bernard, H. R., (2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative

approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Forman, P. (2012). On the historical forms of knowledge production and curation:

Modernity entailed disciplinarity, postmodernity entails antidisciplinarity. Osiris, 27(1): 56–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/667823.

Frodeman, R. (2014). Sustainable knowledge: A theory of interdisciplinarity. New

York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.amazon.com/Sustainable-Knowledge-Theory-Interdisciplinarity-Palgrave/dp/1137303018.

Hyde, L. (1998). Trickster makes this world: Mischief, myth, and art. Macmillan.

Mackey, J. L. (2001). Another approach to interdisciplinary studies. Issues in

Integrative Studies, 19(5): 59–70.

Mansilla, V. B. (2006). Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an

empirical exploration. Research Evaluation, 15(1): 17–29.

McMurtry, A. (2011). The complexities of interdisciplinarity: Integrating two

Different perspectives on interdisciplinary research and education. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 8(2). https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/complicity/index.php/complicity/article/view/8926. Retrieved Feb. 2019.

Montuori, A. (2005). Literature review as creative inquiry: Reframing scholarship

as a creative process. Journal of Transformative Education, 3(4): 374–93.

Montuori, A. (2012). Creative inquiry: Confronting the challenges of scholarship in

the 21st century. Futures, Special Issue: Futures Education, 44(1): 64–70.

Newell, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative

Studies, 19: 1–25.

Repko, A. (2006). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: The case for textbooks. Issues in

Integrative Studies, 24: 112-142.

https://our.oakland.edu/handle/10323/4488.

Repko, A., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. P. (2017). Introduction to

Interdisciplinary Studies. Second edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Shandas, V., & Brown, S. E. (2016). An empirical assessment of

interdisciplinarity: Perspectives from graduate students and program

administrators. Innovative Higher Education, 41(5): 411–23.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9362-y.

Szostak, R. (2012). The interdisciplinary research process. Case Studies in

Interdisciplinary Research: 3-19.

Welch, J. (2018). The impact of newell’s ‘a theory of interdisciplinary studies’:

Reflection and analysis. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 36: 193–211.

Welch, J. (2009). Interdisciplinarity and the history of western epistemology. Issues

in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35–69.

Woodill, S. (2016). Self as method: Strategic interdisciplinarity in teaching and

learning. Cutting Edge: An Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, Spring 2: 12-28.

Published
2019-12-30
How to Cite
Woodill, S., Plate, R., & Jagoda, N. (2019). How Interdisciplinarians Work. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 8(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.vi0.1452