Issues of Equity and Access in State-Designed Promise Programs: A Critical Analysis of Free Community College Legislative Frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32674/crjraq61Keywords:
Community College, critical policy analysis, promise programsAbstract
Tuition-free college programs, often referred to as promise programs, have proliferated across the country. While previous literature on promise programs has shown positive results for the students who receive these scholarships, it has failed to account for program design and administrative features of the program (such as income caps, age, time eligibility, merit, etc.) and what consequences these program design choices have on equitable student outcomes. This critical policy analysis adds to the emerging literature on promise program design by analyzing 202 tuition-free community college legislation proposed at the state level. Results show that tuition-free community college legislative frameworks are proposed with various eligibility, application, funding, and administrative requirements and that program design elements could exacerbate achievement gaps for historically underrepresented students.
References
Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2011). Global social capitalism: Using enterprise to solve the problems of the world. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 10(2 & 3), 83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/csee.2011.10.2.83
Bell, E. (2020). The politics of design tuition-free college: How socially constructed target populations influence policy support. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1706015
Bell, E., & Gándara, D. (2021). Can free community college close racial disparities in postsecondary attainment? How Tulsa Achieves affects racially minoritized student outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 91(6). 1-36. https://doi-org/10.3102/00028312211003501
Boesch, T., Grunewald, R., Nunn, R., & Palmer, V. (2021, February 2). Pandemic pushes mothers of young children out of the labor force. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2021/pandemic-pushes-mothers-of-young-children-out-of-the-labor-force#_ftn1
Canché González, M.A. (2020). Community college students who attained a 4-year degree accrued lower student loan debt than 4-year entrants over 2 decades: Is a 10 percent debt accumulation reduction worth the added “risk”? If so, for whom? Research in Higher Education, 61, 871-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09565-9
Cannon, B., & Joyalle, J. (2016, December). Rethinking the federal-state partnership for free community college: Early indicators from Oregon. Education Commission of the States. https://www.ecs.org/wpcontent/uploads/ECS_FundingReports_BenCannon_F.pdf
Carruthers, C. K., & Fox, W. F. (2016). Aid for all: College coaching, financial aid, and post-secondary persistence in Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 51, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.06.001
Collier, D. A., & Parnther, C. (2021). Conversing with Kalamazoo promise scholars: An inquiry into the beliefs motivations, and experiences of tuition-free community college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 22(4). 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118774561
Davidson, C. T, Ashby-King, D. T., & Sciulli, L. J. (2020). The higher education funding revolution: An exploration of statewide community college “free tuition” programs. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40. https://doi-org /10.1080/10668926.2018.1558135
Dynarski, S, Libassi, C. J., Michelmore, K., & Owen, S. (2018). Closing the gap: The effect of targeted, tuition-free promise on college choices of high achieving, low-income students. NBER Working Paper 25349, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w25349.pdf
Education Commission of the States. (n.d.). About us – History. https://www.ecs.org/about-us/history/
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177-197. https://doi-org/10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
Fontdevila, C., Verger, A., & Avelar, M. (2019). The business of policy: A review of the corporate sector’s emerging strategies in the promotion of education reform. Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1573749
Gándara, D., & Li, A. (2020). Promise for whom? “Free-college” programs and enrollments by race and gender classifications at public, 2-year colleges. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 603-627. https://doi-org/10.3102/0162373720962472
Harnisch, T. L. & Lebioda, K. (2016, May). The promises and pitfalls of State free community college plans: A higher education policy brief. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. https://www.aascu.org/policy/publications/policy-matters/freecommunitycollege.pdf
Heritage Foundation (2023). Mandate for leadership: The conservative promise. https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf
Holzman, B., Klasik, D., & Baker, R. (2019). Gaps in the college application gauntlet. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09566-8
Ison, M. P. (2022). The viability of tuition-free community college. Educational Policy, 36(5), 1054-1077. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820951119
Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical Tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767-795. https://doi-org/10.1177/0895904808320676
Littlepage, B., Clark, T., Wilson, R., & Stout, L. (2018). Tennessee promise: A response to organizational change. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42(6), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1324826
Lubienski, C. (2016). Sector distinctions and the privatization of public education in policymaking. Theory and Research in Education, 14(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878516635332
Ma, J., Pender, M, & Oster, M. (2024). Trends in college pricing 2024. The College Board. https://research.collegeboard.org/trends/college-pricing
McKinney, L & Novak, H. (2012). The relationship between FAFSA filing and persistence among first-year community college students. Community College Review, (41)1, 63-85. https://doi-org/10.1177/0091552112469251
Miller-Adams, M. (2015). Promise nation: Transforming communities through place-based scholarships. W.E. Upjohn Institution for Employment Research.
Miller-Adams, M. (2021). The path to free college: In pursuit of access, equity, and prosperity. Harvard Education Press.
Perna, L. W. & Leigh, E. W. (2018). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 155-180. https://doi-org/10.3102/0013189X17742653
Perna, L. W., Leigh, E. W., & Carrol, S. (2017). “Free college:” A new and improved state approach to increasing educational attainment? American Behavioral Scientist, 61(14), 1740-1756. https://doi-org/10.1177/0002764217744821
Perna, L. W., Wright-Kim, J., & Leigh, E. W. (2020). Is a college promise program an effective use of resources? Understanding the implications of program design and resource investments for equity and efficiency. AERA Open, 6(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420967633
Perna, L. W., Wright-Kim, J., & Leigh, E. W. (2021). Will college promise programs improve or reduce equity? Understanding the contextual conditions that influence program implementation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(26). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5436
Pluhta, E. A., & Penny, G. R. (2013). The effect of a community college promise scholarship on access and success. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37, 723-734. https://doi-org/10.1080/10668926.2011.592412
Popkewitz, T. (1997). A changing terrain of knowledge and power: A social epistemology of educational research. Educational Researcher, 26(9), 18-29. https://doi-org/10.3102/0013189X026009018
Rios-Aguilar, C., Martinez, P., Lyke, A., Graves, D., Lopez, D., & Deil-Amen, R. (2018). Text me: The promise of strategic nudging to increase student awareness and access to financial aid. Wheelhouse: The Center for Community College Leadership and Research, Research Brief, 3(4), 1-8. https://education.ucdavis.edu/sites/main/files/ucdavis_wheelhouse_research_brief_vol3no4_online.pdf
Rosinger, K., Meyer, K., Wang, J. (2021). Leveraging insights from behavioral science and administrative burden in free college program design: A typology. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 4(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.41.19
Saarinen, T. (2008a). Persuasive presuppositions in OECD and EU higher education policy documents. Discourse Studies, 10(3), 341-359. https://doi-org/10.1177/1461445608089915
Schwartz, N. (2021, May 20). Alaska senate passes bill to give free tuition to essential and laid-off workers. Higher Ed Dive. https://www.highereddive.com/news/alaska-senate-passes-bill-to-give-free-tuition-to-essential-and-laid-off-wo/600547/
Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2019). Digest of education statistics 2018: 54th ed. U.S. Department of Education/National Center for Educational Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020009.pdf
The Office of Governor Gretchen Whitmer. (2020, September 10). Gov. Whitmer launches new, first I nation Futures for Frontliners program to offer essential, front-line works a tuition-free path to community college. The Office of Governor Gretchen Whitmer. https://www.highereddive.com/news/alaska-senate -passes-bill-to-give-free-tuition-to-essential-and-laid-off-wo/600547/
Velez, E. D. & Woo, J. H. (2017). The debt burden of bachelor’s degree recipients. U.S. Department of Education/National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington D.C. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017436.pdf
Young, M. D. (1999). Multifocal education policy research: Towards a method for enhancing traditional education policy studies. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 677- 714. https://doi-org/10.3102/00028312036004677
Young, M. D. & Diem, S. (2018). Doing critical policy analysis in education research: An emerging paradigm. In C. R. Lochmiller (Ed.), Complementary research methods for educational leadership and policy studies (pp. 79-98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Higher Education Politics and Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, copyrights for the texts which comprise all issues of Higher Education Politics & Economics (HEPE) are held by the Journal. The compilation as a whole is Copyright © by HEPE, all rights reserved. Items published by HEPE may be freely shared among individuals, but they may NOT be republished in any medium without express written consent from the author(s) and advance notification of the HEPE editorial board. For permission to reprint articles published in the Journal, please contact the Editors-in-Chief.
