Cinematic Framing of Child Trafficking:Victims and Perpetrators in Netflix’s Bhakshak and Sector 36

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32674/x8873t30

Keywords:

child trafficking, sexual abuse, organ trafficking, cinematic framing, victims, perpetrators, narrative

Abstract

This study examines the media framing of victims and perpetrators in Indian films addressing child trafficking, sexual abuse, and organ trafficking, with particular focus on Netflix’s Bhakshak and Sector 36. These films engage with vulnerable social issues by depicting the experiences of trafficked children and societal responses to such crimes. The paper evaluates narrative choices and cinematic approaches that shape representations of victims and perpetrators, highlighting how framing moves beyond conventional narratives to function as persuasive social commentary. It critically examines ethical representation, the reinforcement or disruption of stereotypes, and the risk of sensationalizing trauma for entertainment. Drawing on framing theory, narratology, and feminist film theory, the study analyzes how narrative structures influence audience perception of child trafficking and sexual abuse. The methodology employs narrative analysis of plot, character construction, camera work, and dialogue to assess identity formation. Addressing a gap in media and literary studies, the paper foregrounds Indian cinematic contexts and their role in shaping public discourse on trafficking and abuse.

Author Biography

  • Sheetal Kumari, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India

    SHEETAL KUMARI is a PhD Scholar of English Literature and Cultural Studies in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India. She is an Andrew W. Mellon Visiting Researcher at the University of Oklahoma. Her research areas are Children’s and Young Adult Fiction, Trauma Studies, Memory Studies, Film Studies, Digital Humanities and Medical/Health Humanities. She has published research articles in reputed peer-reviewed journals. She is a recipient of the Open Society Foundations (OSF) Award. Email: sheetal_k@hs.iitr.ac.in ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8080-2913

References

Alcock, B., & Robson, J. (1990). Cagney and Lacey Revisited. Feminist Review, 35(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1990.27

Ananta, B. D. B., & Andini, T. M. (2024). Narratology Tzvetan Todorov Perspective In Dazai Osamu's Film Adaptation “The Fallen Angel” Directed By Genjiro Arato. EDUJ: English Education Journal, 2(2), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.59966/eduj.v2i2.1387

Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Chew, X. Y., & Asl, M. P. The poetics of identity making: precarity and agency in Tahmima Anam’s The Good Muslim. Journal for Cultural Research, 28(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2023.2291711

Christie, N. (1986). The Ideal Victim. In: Fattah, E.A. (Ed) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08305-3_2

Cunniff Gilson, E. (2016). Vulnerability and Victimization: Rethinking Key Concepts in Feminist Discourses on Sexual Violence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 42(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/686753

De Saint Laurent, C., Literat, I., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2021). Internet Memes as Partial Stories: Identifying Political Narratives in Coronavirus Memes. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 205630512198893. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988932

Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (2020). Textual and reader factors in narrative empathy: An empirical reader response study using focus groups. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 29(2), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020927134

Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2008). Empathetic Repair after Mass Trauma. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008092566

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Guizzo, F., Cadinu, M., Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Latrofa, M. (2017). Objecting to Objectification: Women’s Collective Action against Sexual Objectification on Television. Sex Roles, 77(5–6), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0725-8

International Labour Organization. (2015). Commercial Sexual Exploitation and Trafficking of Children “in a nutshell” A Resource for Pacific Island Countries. ILO Report.

Kukunoor, N. (Director). (2014). Lakshmi [Film]. Kukunoor Movies, UV News Media, & Communication Pen India. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2976176/?ref_=ttpl_ov

Gorp, B. V. (2010). Strategies to Take Subjectivity Out of Framing Analysis. In: Kuypers, J. A. (Ed) Doing News Framing Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864463

Leisenring, A. (2006). Confronting “Victim” Discourses: The Identity Work of Battered Women. Symbolic Interaction, 29(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2006.29.3.307

Li, M., Thibodeaux, B. L., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. R., Demahy, C., & Gage, T. (2020). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3), 854–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324

Manlove, C. T. (2007). Visual “Drive” and Cinematic Narrative: Reading Gaze Theory in Lacan, Hitchcock, and Mulvey. Cinema Journal, 46(3), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2007.0025

Mcevoy, K., & Mcconnachie, K. (2012). Victimology in transitional justice: Victimhood, innocence and hierarchy. European Journal of Criminology, 9(5), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812454204

Mishra, V. (2002). Bollywood cinema: temples of desire. Choice Reviews Online, 40(01), 40–0183. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-0183

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6

National Crime Records Bureau. (2022). Crime in India Report. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.

Nimbalkar, A. (Director). (2024). Sector 36 [Film; Netflix release]. Maddock Films & Jio Studios. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt21626774/

Noorani, T. (Director). (2018). Love Sonia [Film]. Zee Studios. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3823392/

O’Brien, E. (2015). Human Trafficking Heroes and Villains. Social & Legal Studies, 25(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663915593410

Periaiya, S., & Nandukrishna, A. T. (2023). What Drives User Stickiness and Satisfaction in OTT Video Streaming Platforms? A Mixed-Method Exploration. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(9), 2326–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2160224

Plantinga, C., & Smith, G. (1999). Introduction: In Plantinga, C., & Smith, G. (Eds) Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Pokhariyal, P., Parikh, M., Bhardwaj, S. (2025). Do Sex Workers Have Human Rights? Looking Through the Lens of Indian Cinema. In: Dubin, A., Goswami, R., Sharma, I. (eds) Indian Cinema and Human Rights: An Intersectional Tale. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6028-2_4

Pulkit (Director). (2024). Bhakshak [Film; Netflix release]. Red Chillies Entertainment. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27936770/

Rai, A. S. (2009). Untimely Bollywood: Globalization and India's New Media Assemblage. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392330

Ramasubramanian, S., & Oliver, M. B. (2003). Portrayals of sexual violence in popular Hindi films 1997-99. Sex Roles, 48(7/8), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022938513819

Rodríguez-López, S. (2018). (De)Constructing Stereotypes: Media Representations, Social Perceptions, and Legal Responses to Human Trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking, 4(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2018.1423447

Sarkar, P. (Director). (2014). Mardaani [Film]. Yash Raj Films. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3495000/

Schmälzle, R., & Grall, C. (2020). The Coupled Brains of Captivated Audiences. Journal of Media Psychology, 32(4), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000271

Schwöbel-Patel, C. (2018). The ‘Ideal’ Victim of International Criminal Law. European Journal of International Law, 29(3), 703–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy056

Seefar & My Choices Foundation. (2021). Understanding child trafficking and Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in West Bengal, India: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) assessment. Seefar.

Smith, M. (1999). Gangsters, Cannibals, Aesthetes, or Apparently Perverse Allegiances: In Plantinga, C., & Smith, G. (Eds) Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Stevenson, K. (2000). Unequivocal Victims: The Historical Roots of the Mystification of the Female Complainant in Rape Cases. Feminist Legal Studies, 8(3), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009270302602

Sullivan, K. (2023). Three levels of framing. WIREs Cognitive Science, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1651

Tan. S. H. & Frijda, N. H. (1999). Sentiment in Film Viewing: In Plantinga, C., & Smith, G. (Eds) Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Todorov, T. (1971). The 2 Principles of Narrative. Diacritics, 1(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/464558

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2024). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons. UNODC.

Vance, C. S. (2012). Innocence and Experience: Melodramatic Narratives of Sex Trafficking and Their Consequences for Law and Policy. History of the Present, 2(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.5406/historypresent.2.2.0200

Wheaton, E. M., Galli, T. V., & Schauer, E. J. (2010). Economics of Human Trafficking. International Migration, 48(4), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00592.x

Wilson, M., & O’Brien, E. (2016). Constructing the ideal victim in the United States of America’s annual trafficking in persons reports. Crime, Law and Social Change, 65(1–2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9600-8

Youngs, D., & Canter, D. V. (2011). Narrative roles in criminal action: An integrative framework for differentiating offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02011.x

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25