A Comparative Study on Capacity Building for Academic Staff in Internationalisation of Higher Education in Vietnam and Australia


  • Diep Nguyen Deakin University




Academics are seen as primary agents in the enactment of higher education internationalisation. However, the achievements of internationalisation are claimed to be constrained by the lack of academics’ involvement and expertise. This research, therefore, compares the policies and practices of capacity building for academics in internationalisation between Australian and Vietnamese universities. More specifically, this research seeks to unpack ideologies and understandings of internationalisation, institutional arrangements of capacity building for academics in internationalisation, and academics’ individual agency in engaging and building their capacity for internationalisation. Using the Capability Approach as a theoretical framework (Sen, 1992, 1999), the research argues that academics’ participation in internationalisation is determined by social and institutional conditions, combined with their individual aspirations and active roles in creating internationalisation and professional development opportunities. This suggests the significance of an enabling structure and active individual agency in expanding academics’ capabilities for successful participation in internationalisation.


Download data is not yet available.


Childress, L. K. (2010). The twenty-first century university: Developing faculty engagement in internationalization. Peter Lang.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education - 6th edition. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research - 4th Edition. Pearson.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Leask, B., & Beelen, J. (2009). Enhancing the engagement of academic staff in international education. Proceedings of the Joint IEAA-EAIE Symposium: Advancing Australia Europe Cooperation in Higher Education, 28-40.

Leask, B., & Bridge, C. (2013). Comparing internationalisation of the curriculum in action across disciplines: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 79-101.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Neuman, L. W. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches - Seventh Edition. Pearson Education.

Proctor, D. (2015). Faculty and international engagement: has internationalization changed academic work? International Higher Education, 83, 15-17.

Rumbley, L. E., Altbach, P. G., & Reisberg, L. (2012). Internationalization Within The Higher Education Context. In D. K. Deardorff, H. de Wit, J. Heyl, & T. Adams (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education (pp. 3-26). SAGE.

Sanderson, G. (2011). Internationalisation and teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(5), 661-676.

Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom: Oxford University Press.

Stohl, M. (2007). We have met the enemy and he is us: The role of the faculty in the internationalization of higher education in the coming decade. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 359-372.

Svetlik, I., & Braček Lalić, A. (2016). The impact of the internationalisation of higher education on academic staff development–the case of Slovenian public universities. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 364-380.



2021-02-05 — Updated on 2021-02-05


How to Cite

Nguyen, D. (2021). A Comparative Study on Capacity Building for Academic Staff in Internationalisation of Higher Education in Vietnam and Australia. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 12(6S1). https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v12i6S1.3088



2024 Emerging Scholar Summary - 16(6) 2024