Essential pathways: An examination of how community colleges compromise their unique contributions to American higher education


  • Khadijah Zakia Ali-Coleman Morgan State University



community college, remedial education, higher education, educational access, college affordability


Community colleges in the United States have historically held a unique position within the system of higher education because of three characteristics. These characteristics include their doctrine of open access, their consistent affordability in comparison to other higher education options, and courses that are directly applicable to the workforce. However, over the years, contradictions have arisen that compromise the practice of these ideals. Focusing on three policy priorities, this analysis determines how effective community colleges are today in offering students an education that is accessible, applicable to the labor market, and affordable. The concluding points include predictions of what the future of community colleges looks like within the next twenty years.


Allen, J. P. & Turner, E. (1989). The most ethnically diverse urban places in the United States. Urban Geography, 10(6), 523–539.

Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America's community

colleges. Harvard University Press.

Baum, S., Ma, J., Bell, D. W., & Elliott, D. C. (2014). Trends in college pricing 2014.

College Board.

Berdahl, R. (2014). Thoughts on the history of university systems in the US. Center

for Studies in Higher Education, 1–5.

Berube, M. R. (1991). American presidents and education. Greenwood Press.

Boggs, G. R., & McPhail, C. J. (2016). Practical leadership in community colleges.


Borstelmann, T. (1999). Jim crow's coming out: Race relations and American foreign

policy in the Truman years. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29(3), 549–569.

Cohen, A. M., Brawer, F. B., & Kisker, C. B. (2014). The American community

college (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Dougherty, K. J., Lahr, H., & Morest, V. S. (2017). Reforming the American

community college: Promising changes and their challenges (CCRC Working Paper No. 98). Teachers College, Columbia University.

Fields, R., & Parsad, B. (2012). Tests and cut scores used for student placement in

postsecondary education: Fall 2011. National Assessment Governing Board.

Gillett‐Karam, R. (2016). Student affairs: Moving from theories and theorists to

practice and practitioners. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2016(174), 85–91.

Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher

education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425-463. Retrieved from https://search-proquest

Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Haymarket Books.

Graham, H. D. (2011). The uncertain triumph: Federal education policy in the Kennedy and Johnson years. UNC Press Books.

Great Schools Partnership. (2014). Access. The Glossary of Education Reform.

Grubb, J. M., Scott, P. H., & Good, D. W. (2017). The answer is yes. Community College Review, 45(2), 79–98.

Hansen, W. L., & Stampen, J. O. (1987). Economics and financing of higher education: The tension between quality and equity. In P. G. Altbach, & R. O. Berdahl (Eds.), Higher Education in American Society (2nd ed., pp. 101–125). Prometheus Press.

Holmes, C., & Lindsay, D. (2018). “Do You Want Fries With That?”: The McDonaldization of university education—Some critical reflections on nursing higher education. SAGE Open, 8(3).

Hutcheson, P. A. (2007). The Truman Commission’s vision of the future. Thought & Action, (2007)107–115.

Korn, M., & Hackman, M. (2018, Feb 23). Education bill brings out some unusual lobbying suspects. Wall Street Journal.

Krantz, L. (2015, July 3). For many, remedial math not a solution. The Boston Globe.

Kromydas, T. (2017, October 13). Rethinking higher education and its relationship with social inequalities: Past knowledge, present state and future potential. Palgrave Communications, 3(1).

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.

Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., & Kinzie, J. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

Ma, J., & Baum, S. (2016, April). Trends in community colleges: Enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion. College Board Research.

Maitre, M. (2014, November 11). Reworking remedial education. EdSource.

Marklein, M. (2013, August 20). Students get financial aid at highest rates since WWII. USA Today.

McLendon, M., Hearn, J, & Mokher, C. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 687-713.

McKinney, L., Mukherjee, M., Wade, J., Shefman, P., & Breed, R. (2015). Community college students' assessments of the costs and benefits of borrowing to finance higher education. Community College Review, 43(4), 329–354.

Mejia, M. C., Rodriguez, O., & Johnson, H. (2016, November). Preparing students for success in California's community colleges. Public Policy Institute of California.

Mellow, G. O. (2017, August 28). The biggest misconception about today's college students. The New York Times.

Nevarez, C., & Wood, J. L. (2010). Community college leadership and administration: Theory, practice, and change. Lang.

O’Banion, T. U. (2019). A brief history of workforce education in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(3), 216–223.

Palmadessa, A. L. (2017). America's College Promise: Situating President Obama's initiative in the history of federal higher education aid and access policy. Community College Review, 45(1), 52–70.

Pierce, L. (2016, December). The case for a case management approach in advising

academically underprepared students. Academic Advising Today, 39(4).

Pretlow, J., & Patteson, J. (2015). Operating dual enrollment in different policy environments: An examination of two states. New Direction for Community Colleges, 2015(169), 21–29.

Pusser, B., & Levin, J. (2009, December 8). Re-imagining community colleges in the 21st century. Center for American Progress.

Shaw, K. M., Valadez, J. R., & Rhoads, R. A. (Eds.). (1999). Community colleges as cultural texts: Qualitative explorations of organizational and student culture. SUNY Press.

Singleton, H. (2011). An early/middle college high school case study: How graduates perceive their experiences as contributing to their academic success and college preparedness (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Central (Order No. 3471663).

Smith Morest, V. (2013). From access to opportunity: The evolving social roles of community colleges. The American Sociologist, 44(4), 319–328.

St. Rose, A., & Hill, C. (2013). Women in community colleges: Access to success.

American Association of University Women.

Tampio, N. (2015). There is no such thing as free community college. Aljazeera America.

The Association of Community College Trustees. First dollar vs. last dollar promise models. (n.d.).

Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of American higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Walsh, R. M. (2015). Active and collaborative learning at a community college in a mid-Atlantic state (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (No. 10076275).

Weerts, D. J. (2014). State funding and the engaged university: Understanding

community engagement and state appropriations for higher education. Review of Higher Education, 38(1), 133–169.

Wilson, M. E. (2009). Struggle and success: The experiences of urban high school

seniors participating in a dual enrollment program (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from ProQuest Central (No. 3354348).

Zook, G. (1947). Higher education for democracy: A report of the president's commission on higher education. President's Commission on Higher





How to Cite

Ali-Coleman, K. Z. (2020). Essential pathways: An examination of how community colleges compromise their unique contributions to American higher education. Higher Education Politics and Economics, 5(1), 54–69.



Review Articles