An Examination of Principal Professional Development and its Alignment to Professional Standards and Professional Development Constructs
Keywords:educational leadership, principal professional development, leadership development, principal pipeline
Principals need and require specific professional development that is rigorous, effective, and aligned to professional leadership standards and effective professional development constructs. This case study examined the professional development strategies, and practices, used by school districts and their alignment to the California Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (CPSEL) and effective professional development constructs. School district administrators and principals representing the Southern San Joaquin Valley, a predominantly rural area of California, participated in this research via interviews and focus groups. This research is critical as rural areas are often underrepresented in educational research. The findings indicate a lack of intentional alignment of principal professional development with professional standards and professional development constructs. The findings call for districts to take an intentional approach to principal development that is aligned with these frameworks to ensure principals are provided with effective and rigorous support for their educational leadership, growth, and development.
Aliaga, A. O. (2001). Human capital, HRD and the knowledge organization. In A.O. Aliaga (Ed.), Proceedings from AHRD Conference: Academy of Human Resource Development. (pp.427-434). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED453406.pdf
Bailey, C. (2007). Introduction to qualitative field research. A guide to qualitative field research. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983204
Béteille, T., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research. 41(4), 904-919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.003
Bishop, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & Jaquith, A. (2015). Maximizing the use of new state professional learning investments to support student, educator, and school system growth: State guidance for key district stakeholders. Learning Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606456.pdf
Bottoms, G., & Fry, B. (2009). The district leadership challenge: empowering principals to improve teaching and learning. Southern Regional Education Board (SREB).
Branch, G., Hanushek, E., & Rivkin, S. (2013). School leaders matter: Measuring the impact of effective principals. Education Next 13, 1-8.
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010).Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226078014.001.0001
California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2018). Administrative services standards booklet. https://www.ctc.ca.gov/docs/default-source/educator-prep/standards/asc-admin-handbook.pdf?sfvrsn=48
California Department of Education. (2012). Greatness by design: A report by state superintendent of public instruction Tom Torlakson’s task force on educator excellence. https://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/documents/greatnessfinal.pdf
California Department of Education (n.d.), Fiscal, demographic, and performance data on California’s K-12 schools. https://www.ed-data.org/index
Chennamsetti, P. (2020). Assisting school leaders in overcoming challenges. Journal of School
Administration Research and Development. Volume 5, Issue S2, pp. 93-99.
Darling-Hammond, L., Orphanos, S., LaPointe, M., & Weeks, S. (2007). Leadership
development in California. (Getting down to facts: Effectiveness studies series). Stanford University, Institute for Research on Education Policy & Practice and the School Redesign Network.
Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Advances in
leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.004
Elmore, R. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement. The Albert Shanker Institute.
Fogarty, R.J. & Pete, B.M., 2004. The adult learner: Some things we know. Corwin Press.
Fullan, M. (2002). Leadership and sustainability. Principal Leadership, 3(4), 1-8. https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396047460.pdf
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Gates, S. M., Baird, M. D., Master, B.K., & Chavez-Herrerias, E, 2019. Principal pipelines: A feasible, affordable, and effective way for districts to improve schools. RAND Corporation, 2019. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2666.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2666
George W. Bush Institute. (2016). Principal talent management according to the evidence:
A review of the literature. George W. Bush Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED587185.pdf
Geverdt, D. (2015). Education demographic and geographic estimates program (EDGE): Locale boundaries user’s manual (NCES 2016-012). https://nces.ed.gov/programs/EDGE/docs/NCES_LOCALE_USERSMANUAL_2016012.pdf
Gigliotti, R., (2020). Sudden shifts to fully online: Perceptions of campus preparedness and implications for leading through disruption. The Journal of Literacy and Technology, 21 (2).
Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability or non-sustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity, Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05277975
Hitt, D.H. & Tucker, P.D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practice found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531-560. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0034654315614911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911
Hoffman, J. (2004). Building resilient leaders. Leadership, 34, 35–38.
Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium. (2008). Educational leadership policy standards 2008: As adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration in 2007.
Kaufman, J. H., Gates, S. M., Harvey, M., Wang, Y., & Barrett, M. (2017). What it takes to operate and maintain principal pipelines: Costs and other resources. Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/What-It-Takes-to-Operate-and-Maintain-Principal-Pipelines.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2078
Kearney, K. (2010). Effective principals for California schools: Building a coherent leadership development system. WestEd.
Kearney, K. (Ed.). (2015). Moving leadership standards into everyday work: Descriptions of practice (2nd ed.). WestEd.
League of California Cities (2018). South San Joaquin Valley division. League of California Cities. https://www.cacities.org/Member-Engagement/Regional-Divisions/South-San-Joaquin
Learning Forward (n.d). Definition of professional development. https://learningforward.org/about/professional-learning-definition/
Manna, P. (2015). Developing excellent school principals to advance teaching and learning: Considerations for state policy. Wallace Foundation. https://www.house.ga.gov/Documents/CommitteeDocuments/2017/Leadership_Academy/1/Developing-Excellent-School-Principals.pdf
Mumford, M., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 87–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00044-2
Nafukho, F. M., Hairston, N. R., & Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545– 551. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000299843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000299843
National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). Schools
and Staffing Survey (SASS). U.S. Department of Education.
Norton, S. (2008). Human resources administration for educational leaders. Sage.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis:
Rice, J. K. (2010). Principal effectiveness and leadership in an era of accountability: What research says. Brief 8. National center for analysis of longitudinal data in education research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509682.pdf
Riley, D. L., & Meredith, J. (2017). State efforts to strengthen school leadership: insights from
CCSSO Action Groups. Policy Studies Associates, Inc. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580215.pdf
School Leaders Network (2014). CHURN: The High Cost of Principal Turnover. http://iowaascd.org/files/7014/5978/0122/principal_turnover_cost.pdf
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Education and economic growth: Social forces influencing
American education. University of Chicago Press.
Scott, S., & Webber, C. F. (2008). Evidence‐based leadership development: the 4L framework. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(6), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810908343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810908343
Sun, C. (2011). School leadership: Improving state systems for leader development (NASBE discussion guide). https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledgecenter/Documents/NASBEDiscussion-Guide-School-Leadership-Improving-State-Systems-for-Leader-Development.pdf
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.) REAP allocation spreadsheet [Data file]. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/reapsrsa/fy18reapallocationspreadsheet.xlsx
Wright, S., O’Brien, B.C., Nimmon, L., Law, M., & Mylopoulos, M. (2016). Research design considerations. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 8(1), 97-98. https://www.jgme.org/doi/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00566.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00566.1
Zellner, L., Jinkins, D., Gideon, B., Doughty, S., & McNamara, P. (2002). Saving the principal: The evolution of initiatives that made a difference in the recruitment and retention of school leadership. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED467670.pdf
Zepeda, S. J., Parylo, O., & Bengtson, E. (2014). Analyzing principal professional development practices through the lens of adult learning theory. Professional Development in Education, 40(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.821667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.821667
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of School Administration Research and Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License.